Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 1) to expand Americans' access to the ballot box, reduce the influence of big money in politics, strengthen ethics rules for public servants, and implement other anti-corruption measures for the purpose of for
expand Americans' access to the ballot box, reduce the influence of big money in politics, strengthen ethics rules for public servants, and implement other anti-corruption measures; Yes Mr Mullin, I can definetly see why you would vote against this. What the Hell?? expand access to ballot boxes. Why would you want to give more options or accessibility to people to vote. Reduce the influence of Big Money. Oh hell no! stop the big money comeing to your campaign to tell you what you are thinking and are the only people you represent. anyone with convictions and ethics dont need it. So again, I can see why you vote against that. Strengthen Ethic rules for public serviants. Oh hell screw that one. You dont need rules for ethics. I mean no public official appears to be ruled by ethics, they are ruled simply by big money donors. Your voting record is really telling in they type of person you are and who you representing. I completely get why implementing anti corruption measures would get your no vote. I cant wait for the 2022 election to bring your voting record and where you have stood on issues and how you promoted what you knew and know to be lies.
As a veteran, I really don't understand the constant protection from accountability that so-called conservative lawmakers insist on to shield those in uniformed public service who merit scrutiny, and deny justice to the public through bureaucratic -- and often not-legislative (i.e. conservative activist courts inventing "qualified immunity") -- loopholes.