Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 637

Stopping EPA Overreach Act of 2017

    The fact that the bill states that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant tells me that the sponsors do not understand what pollution is! The EPA needs to continue to fight for cleaner air!
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Keep your dirty money grubbing mitts OFF the EPA!! It's not here for you. It's here to ensure we leave something for future generations!!!
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    No, no, no! Please remember the water & air quality before EPA.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    I see this as a step to eradicating the EPA and it's protection against environmental destruction and thereby affecting human and animal health.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    The EPA is there to protect us from creating a dangerous environment for Americans. The pollutants mentioned in the bill are a real threat.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    The GOP's seeming disdain for the environment and any rule or agency that seeks to protect or preserve it is myopic and willfully ignorant at best and utterly inhuman at worst. Climate change exists. Choosing to ignore it WILL (not MAY) cost a vast number of human lives, make the US less safe (as US defense agencies have warned repeatedly) and exacerbate our immigration issues (as US defense agencies have also warned repeatedly).
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    The regulations of the EPA handcuff the growth and productivity of our economy. Turn environmental governance over to the state and local authorities. Let them manage their own affairs and take away the federal stranglehold.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Leave the EPA alone and let them do their job of protecting Americans! Please don't choose to ignore America's past battles with pollution from which the need of a regulatory body was created. The patchwork of state regulations aren't a suitable replacement for this important federal agency. If the EPA is weakened or abolished, many Americans may be poisoned by their own local environment which will lead to more sickness (healthcare!) and lawsuits!
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Oppose this bill. H.R. 637 would declassify greenhouse gases as pollutants and prevent any federal agencies from regulating them. Disgraceful!
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    HR 637 declassifies greenhouse gases as pollutants & prevents agencies from regulating them.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Here in Logan, UT, we have air pollution formed from NOx and ammonia. Deregulating NOx is a bad idea for UT. And that's not even including the impacts of deregulating greenhouse gases. This bill is based in politics, not science.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Climate change is the most urgent issue of our time. The EPA has an important role in preserving the environment and protecting human health.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    We must continue to make the fight against climate change (through reduction of greenhouse gases among other things) a priority for the sake of ourselves and future generations.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    The EPA is set up in a way that can proactively protect Americans from pollution disasters such as Love Canal, and imposing restrictions on the ability to identify and regulate emerging contaminants only increases the harm done to American public health.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    This is actually chilling. No, no we are not going to sacrifice our environment for corporate profits.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Leave the EPA alone.It needs to be there to keep you money grabbing idiots from wrecking the air and water we need to exist on this earth.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    We have to live on this planet. FUND the EPA. Protect Earth.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    This bill is a terrible idea! The EPA protects us and our environment from the immediacy of greed!! I have seen in my lifetime the positive effects of strong environmental regulation. It breaks my heart to think that some people, would turn back the clock. PLANET BEFORE PROFITS!!
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    The regulations are to protect the people, not corporations. Create more jobs and financial increases (which is what the republicans believe they will do by deregulating costly requirements) by investing in clean energy and power. Encourage job training in that industry. There will be no people to spend their money if there is no environment for them to live in. People will not accept going backwards.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    I have to wonder if this bill is inspired by campaign donation. Who the hell is pro air pollution?
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE