Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 4470

Do the EPA, States, and Water Utilities Need to Notify the Public About Lead Levels in Drinking Water?

Argument in favor

This bill sets clear standards for when water utilities, states, and the EPA are responsible for notifying the public about lead contamination in drinking water to keep consumers informed and healthy.

···
02/12/2016
"Because of the conduct of Gov. Snyder’s administration and his refusal to take responsibility, families will suffer from lead poisoning for the rest of their lives. Children in Flint will be plagued with brain damage and other health problems. The people of Flint deserve more than an apology.” [berniesanders.com]
Like (335)
Follow
Share
BarackObama's Opinion
···
02/12/2016
“Our children should not have to be worried about the water that they’re drinking in American cities. That’s not something that we should accept.” [detroitnews.com]
Like (134)
Follow
Share
jjennetta8's Opinion
···
02/08/2016
Incredibly, this bill has not been on the books for years. Had it been the case, the debacle in Flint, Michigan may have been avoided or at least minimized. Consumers deserve to know what is in their water, especially if there are contaminants harmful to human health and development. This bill should clearly pass and sadly hasn't already.
Like (43)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

Coordination between state regulators, the EPA, and drinking water utilities is sufficient. The public is already alerted about unsafe lead levels in drinking water. This bill isn't needed to protect consumers.

StratonGarrard's Opinion
···
02/09/2016
I already receive water reports, and state agencies also already alert cities if they have unsafe levels of lead. Wouldn't it be better if Congress reduced redundancies so that we can reduce spending on unnecessary bureaucracy? Vote no if inefficient governments give you a headache.
Like (16)
Follow
Share
Cathy's Opinion
···
02/08/2016
We don't need more government regulations and we certainly don't need the EPA.
Like (9)
Follow
Share
Thomas's Opinion
···
02/10/2016
This is an underhanded way to blame the EPA for Flint. We already get water reports.
Like (8)
Follow
Share
    "Because of the conduct of Gov. Snyder’s administration and his refusal to take responsibility, families will suffer from lead poisoning for the rest of their lives. Children in Flint will be plagued with brain damage and other health problems. The people of Flint deserve more than an apology.” [berniesanders.com]
    Like (335)
    Follow
    Share
    I already receive water reports, and state agencies also already alert cities if they have unsafe levels of lead. Wouldn't it be better if Congress reduced redundancies so that we can reduce spending on unnecessary bureaucracy? Vote no if inefficient governments give you a headache.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    “Our children should not have to be worried about the water that they’re drinking in American cities. That’s not something that we should accept.” [detroitnews.com]
    Like (134)
    Follow
    Share
    Incredibly, this bill has not been on the books for years. Had it been the case, the debacle in Flint, Michigan may have been avoided or at least minimized. Consumers deserve to know what is in their water, especially if there are contaminants harmful to human health and development. This bill should clearly pass and sadly hasn't already.
    Like (43)
    Follow
    Share
    It seems a natural right that people should be given knowledge - when available - about what they're consuming.
    Like (20)
    Follow
    Share
    This is a no brainer, we must keep people informed about any potential health risks.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    Those nays are claiming we already receive water reports. Yes, once a year, but if levels of anything adverse rise to a dangerous level, we have the right to know immediately, not in a year after untold damage can occur, like has just happened. Nays should be forced to drink the Flint MI water until their next annual water report! Idiots.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    We don't need more government regulations and we certainly don't need the EPA.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    This is an underhanded way to blame the EPA for Flint. We already get water reports.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Prime example of what's wrong with government. We know the communications between fed and state suck. I want to make sure the GOP or anyone not to attach any riders on this and get it passed!
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    Should we have the right to know if we're being poisoned?
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    The EPA has shown recently that it is not a functioning agency. After the mining disaster EPA can not be trusted to tell the truth and it's past history has shown that it is better at harassing home owner and small businesses than it is at being effective. EPA has become a political punishment agency and not an environment protection agency. Time this agency is dissolved or it policies and rules stripped from the books.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    This is proof that the government can't do anything right, anything at all. As it stands, yes, there should be more investigation into the quality of water. Yet, to trust a monopoly such as the government to amend its failure is foolish. The free market is the only feasible path to assure such ill repute never happens again.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    We must secure the safety of the citizens.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    The state of water systems in this country is another indication of lack of infrastructure spending
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    I think we should absolutely know everything that we consume as it is a natural born right to know what is going into our bodies.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Why is this an argument? If the public is paying for a service then they should know what they are paying for.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    I am baffled that this is even a question.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    I believe the EPA should be abolished, as states can do the same things. However, lead is a terribly dangerous thing. Living in a first-world country, we should not have to worry about contaminated drinking water.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Everyone has the right to be notified so they can stop drinking contaminated water.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE