Only if he is convicted. He's still innocent until proven guilty

Awards (like medals) can be withdrawn if it was found out later that the person did not earn it. To the extent that this medal was awarded on the basis of an error of judgment, it ought to be withdrawn.

I'm making an effort to not care. Given the number of men who participate in violence against women or who condone a level of violence against women, I suppose we would end up taking away most of the medals awarded to men if the criteria was the lived experience of the women they knew throughout their lives. My understanding of the situation is that men really don't care whether other men rape women--unless they themselves have laid claim to or feel some vague or not so vague sense of responsibility toward the woman in question. Women care. But women's opinions, like their bodies, are of little interest to most men. Unless they feel a sense of ownership, in which case, it has almost nothing to do with the woman or what happened to her & everything to do with the ego of the affronted man. So onward! forward! affronted men. Do whatever you need to do. I am unconvinced you give a flip about what happens to women unless your egos are involved. (Isn't that the point of the Planned Parenthood fuss? You don't care about women's health or about babies. What you do care about is power & control. Anything that challenges your control, like women being smart enough to know they've been raped or that they do not want to have a baby or that cancer is a problem, is such an affront that after you drop the jockeys, get out the tape measure--or is it yardstick?--and pee on the wall, it becomes important to tell women NO, YOU CAN'T!)