Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 3716

Do the Feds Need to Ensure that Terminated Health Care Providers Don’t Receive Funds From Medicare, Medicaid or CHIP?

Argument in favor

Health care providers that have been terminated by Medicare, Medicaid, or CHIP shouldn't be receiving federal funds. This bill would lead to better coordination between federal agencies and states, which will save $28 million in tax dollars.

BTSundra's Opinion
···
03/02/2016
If someone has been terminated, don't keep funding them. This is basic common sense for keeping down government waste.
Like (16)
Follow
Share
Loraki's Opinion
···
12/27/2016
If health care providers are terminated from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, or any other medical program, it doesn't seem right for them to continue to get federal money. AND IT'S ANOTHER SPENDING CUT!!! I LIKE THAT!
Like (8)
Follow
Share
Mark's Opinion
···
03/03/2016
Who had the bright idea not to make this mandatory to begin with. If that numbskull is still alive he/she needs to be put in jail.
Like (6)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

State Medicaid programs are already subject to reporting requirements when they terminate providers. Excluding terminated providers from CHIP and Medicare won't make much difference.

Elinor's Opinion
···
03/02/2016
Medicaid and Chip are supposedly run by states, NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
Like (4)
Follow
Share
Michael's Opinion
···
03/03/2016
+ There are a few reasons against this: 1) this potentially limits payments to states, not providers directly; 2) the criteria for termination are not yet known, and it seems like the termination by one state for a state-specific rule could result in the termination by federal programs, which seem like TRAP laws could harm providers nation-wide; 3) the process for remediating a terminated status and being removed from the database doesn't seem clear in this bill or the law it is amending.
Like (3)
Follow
Share
Jim2423's Opinion
···
03/02/2016
The federal government seems to be the easy element to cheat money out of. They are so slow on watching and almost impossible on catching anyone it just wouldn't work without the states doing their part.
Like (1)
Follow
Share
    If someone has been terminated, don't keep funding them. This is basic common sense for keeping down government waste.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    If health care providers are terminated from Medicare, Medicaid, CHIP, or any other medical program, it doesn't seem right for them to continue to get federal money. AND IT'S ANOTHER SPENDING CUT!!! I LIKE THAT!
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Who had the bright idea not to make this mandatory to begin with. If that numbskull is still alive he/she needs to be put in jail.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    Seems silly to ask this question. Of coarse the Government should stop terminated providers from Federal funds. But Ho Hum, it's only pocket change!
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Very commonsense measure to prevent against wasteful government spending, which we already have plenty of. I can't see any possible opposition to this bill, it should receive unanimous bipartisan support.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Apparently, a number of companies have been submitting bills to federal programs (like Medicare, Medicaid or other Childrens' Health programs) after being removed from those programs. That is fraud, pure & simple, & needs to be stopped. This can easily be facilitated by a little communication between states & the federal government. While valid claims/bills need to be paid according to contractual obligations, this legislation can help stop greedy corporations from cajoling even more money from the taxpayers & government coffers.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Medicaid and Chip are supposedly run by states, NOT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    + There are a few reasons against this: 1) this potentially limits payments to states, not providers directly; 2) the criteria for termination are not yet known, and it seems like the termination by one state for a state-specific rule could result in the termination by federal programs, which seem like TRAP laws could harm providers nation-wide; 3) the process for remediating a terminated status and being removed from the database doesn't seem clear in this bill or the law it is amending.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    I see 28 million reasons to vote yes on this bill!
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Hmm - making sure those who should not be paid don't get paid. This shouldn't require a vote for common sense.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    This is bipartisan legislation that is intended to foster efficient government and cost effective spending. This is the epitome of the "no-brainer".
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    So long as there are no ear marks on this bill.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    The job of the Feds is to protect and serve the American people, and when it comes to the health of our citizens, nothing is more important. This is why it is essential that our taxpayer dollars we put into programs like Medicaid and Medicare are being used properly; no funds should go to a terminated health care provider, because it is most likely that those funds will not be used for their primary reason, to provide affordable healthcare for Americans. Government needs to know where Medicaid/Medicare Funds are going.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    The reasons to vote against this only make me wonder why we wouldn't vote for it. It's not overregulation, it doesn't cost anything, and it appears to be tying up loose ends. Would be nice to know if there any any riders or not though. Those can ruin a perfectly sensible bill.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    It is amazing to me that this isn't automatic already. Yes, kick these people out of tax payer funded programs.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    The bill is here and it makes sense so why not. This makes double sure we don't waste those funds.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    This should be a byproduct of being terminated, I would think. I mean, if your name is removed from the list of participating providers why would you keep getting funds? Seems to me that many software programs being use for these agencies should be recoded to make these changes automatically.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    If they don't support Medicare, why should the Government give them money. They have the option
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    That's are tax money if they don't do the work are taxes should not be spent on it
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Doh! (Head slap)
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE