Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 3051

Should Gun Sellers Have to Wait for a Completed Background Check to Transfer a Firearm?

Argument in favor

If a background check is a required step in the process for an unlicensed buyer, there shouldn’t be an exception that allows the buyer to take possession of the gun when a background check takes more than three business days.

···
03/29/2016
"I come from a state that has virtually no gun control. And yet, at political peril, I voted for an instant background check, which I want to see strengthened and expanded." [ontheissues.org]
Like (165)
Follow
Share
BarackObama's Opinion
···
03/29/2016
"Each time this comes up, we are fed the excuse that common-sense reforms like background checks might not have stopped the last massacre, or the one before that, or the one before that, so why bother trying. I reject that thinking... We know we can’t stop every act of violence, every act of evil in the world. But maybe we could try to stop one act of evil, one act of violence." [whitehouse.gov]
Like (110)
Follow
Share
Steven's Opinion
···
02/29/2016
Will the customer die if he doesn't get the firearm prior to the background check being completed? Call the police, or is the customer going to go "Charles Bronson" Death Wish and deal with it himself? A background check for a deadly weapon, a customer can wait. If he needs it that urgently, there's more going on.
Like (10)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

It shouldn’t take more than three business days to complete a background check on an unlicensed prospective gun buyer, and if it does the business owner should be able to transfer the gun at their discretion.

DonaldTrump's Opinion
···
03/29/2016
"The overwhelming majority of people who go through background checks are law-abiding gun owners." [donaldjtrump.com]
Like (58)
Follow
Share
BTSundra's Opinion
···
02/25/2016
These loopholes don't exist, like as the "Gun Show Loophole". Let's not throw money away voting on things that don't have any effect.
Like (9)
Follow
Share
Phylos's Opinion
···
02/26/2016
This will have zero measurable effect on crime.
Like (5)
Follow
Share
    "I come from a state that has virtually no gun control. And yet, at political peril, I voted for an instant background check, which I want to see strengthened and expanded." [ontheissues.org]
    Like (165)
    Follow
    Share
    "The overwhelming majority of people who go through background checks are law-abiding gun owners." [donaldjtrump.com]
    Like (58)
    Follow
    Share
    "Each time this comes up, we are fed the excuse that common-sense reforms like background checks might not have stopped the last massacre, or the one before that, or the one before that, so why bother trying. I reject that thinking... We know we can’t stop every act of violence, every act of evil in the world. But maybe we could try to stop one act of evil, one act of violence." [whitehouse.gov]
    Like (110)
    Follow
    Share
    Will the customer die if he doesn't get the firearm prior to the background check being completed? Call the police, or is the customer going to go "Charles Bronson" Death Wish and deal with it himself? A background check for a deadly weapon, a customer can wait. If he needs it that urgently, there's more going on.
    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
    These loopholes don't exist, like as the "Gun Show Loophole". Let's not throw money away voting on things that don't have any effect.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    This will have zero measurable effect on crime.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Trust the store owner to sell 'at their discretion'? That is a dangerous idea and would allow unqualified individuals to decide who is and isn't armed.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Of course they should have to wait. Who has big plans in 3 days when they get their gun that can't be put off a couple more days? Anyone that raises their hand probably shouldn't have a gun anyway!
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    A background check does not inhibit anyone's second amendment rights...
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    No
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Guns are big business. That doesn't mean it's ok to conduct business without the proper safety checks. If someone wants a gun badly enough that they can't or won't wait for a background check then they either shouldn't have one, or have a dangerous circumstance that should be reported to police who have the weapons, training, and authorization to use them when necessary.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    20 dead children. Their blood is on the hands of whoever votes against common sense laws. We have done NOTHING since that day thanks to the strong arm of NRA propaganda and it makes me sick. I will never vote for someone who isn't level headed about gun laws.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    I have mixed feelings about this. Naturally, people who pose a danger to others should not be facilitated by the system. However, this law could also be used by our government to prevent gun sales entirely, simply by delaying or stopping the vetting process. Allowing sales to move forward after some defined period provides incentive for agencies to ensure the process is streamlined, timely, and effective.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    This is a state issue, not a federal issue. Where does the constitution grant federal regulatory power here? No where.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    I am a gun owner myself, a veteran and a patriot. Now while i do not want to ban assault weapons or make more gun free zones, this is a sensible plan to keep firearms out of people who pose a risk to themselves and others. The citizenry should not feel that the government is taking guns away, just taking measures to prevent horrific mass shootings from unstable individuals.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Again, there are no loopholes. Read "hands off my gun" for a full fact check on current gun laws and complete history of gun control. Everything is documented with facts, not BS.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Preach! I love going shooting and I love my second amendment but there has to be stricter background checks, mental health backgrounds as well. People with known mental disorders, schizo, severe bipolar, depression etc. should have to pass stricter background checks to purchase firearms. Violent crime felons and career violent/petty crime individuals should be denied the right to purchase firearms. I also know that criminals will get guns regardless of background checks through theft, private sales and so on but maybe this would help prevent even a couple violent criminals from getting guns.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Common sense.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    we should overwhelmingly outlaw gun ownership except for fairly narrow circumstances, so any incremental restrictive law towards those ends, I'm in favor
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    I'm not sure this requires words, if people wanted to get guns illegally, they are not going to buy them from legal gun owning citizens, it would also make it impossible to sell out firearms, who many times we just sell to friends anyway
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE