Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 2666

Should the FCC be Banned From Regulating the Rates Consumers Pay for Broadband Internet?

Argument in favor

The FCC doesn’t want to regulate the rates consumers are charged for their broadband internet. This bill would prevent them from doing so while still allowing the FCC to enforce transparent billing requirements and regulate data roaming charges.

BTSundra's Opinion
···
04/15/2016
As long as there aren't regulations on who can be an ISP, the market will sort this out for itself.
Like (12)
Follow
Share
David's Opinion
···
04/13/2016
Government price controls are never a good idea. They stifle innovation, deprive companies of profit, lower wages for workers of said companies, and curtail sales pricing which benefit consumers. We already subsidize broadband in "underserved" communities by federal fiat, artificially inflating the price we pay our providers. Companies are incentivized to provide outstanding service by the potential for profit. Consumers need to realize that we get what we pay for, and sometimes flank steak will have to do when we want fillet. Perhaps Congress would be interested in regulating speaking fees and salaries of former members. No? Didn't think so.
Like (8)
Follow
Share
GrumpyMSgt's Opinion
···
04/12/2016
Yes! Hands off the internet! Don't need the Feds anywhere near this last bastion of freedom. Look at China and the Internet.
Like (7)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

Despite what the current FCC Chairman says, Congress shouldn’t close the door on FCC regulation for the rates consumers pay for broadband internet. A future commission may want that authority, and Congress would have to repeal this ban.

Rachel's Opinion
···
04/15/2016
Broadband internet is, in most markets, supplied by monopolies or duopolies with little to no motivation to keep process reasonable. At the same time, the internet is as much a necessary utility in modern life as electricity. People, particularly those in low socio-economic brackets, should not be at the mercy of exploitative corporate agendas when it comes to being able to fully participate in society (including paying bills, finding jobs, and communicating with loved ones) because of prohibitively expensive internet bills, and it is right and proper that the FCC relate these charges.
Like (39)
Follow
Share
Elizabeth's Opinion
···
04/15/2016
The fcc IS responsible for regulating communication and ensuring that the public is not entirely fleeced for services
Like (19)
Follow
Share
Kyle's Opinion
···
04/15/2016
The telecommunications industry is in dire need of trust-busting, and in the meantime we need regulatory powers to protect consumers from exploitative practices and pricing.
Like (15)
Follow
Share
    As long as there aren't regulations on who can be an ISP, the market will sort this out for itself.
    Like (12)
    Follow
    Share
    Broadband internet is, in most markets, supplied by monopolies or duopolies with little to no motivation to keep process reasonable. At the same time, the internet is as much a necessary utility in modern life as electricity. People, particularly those in low socio-economic brackets, should not be at the mercy of exploitative corporate agendas when it comes to being able to fully participate in society (including paying bills, finding jobs, and communicating with loved ones) because of prohibitively expensive internet bills, and it is right and proper that the FCC relate these charges.
    Like (39)
    Follow
    Share
    The fcc IS responsible for regulating communication and ensuring that the public is not entirely fleeced for services
    Like (19)
    Follow
    Share
    The telecommunications industry is in dire need of trust-busting, and in the meantime we need regulatory powers to protect consumers from exploitative practices and pricing.
    Like (15)
    Follow
    Share
    You have to asked yourself, who is behind this bill. Why are we trying to protect companies that, with this bill passed, could unethically raise the rates at their own greedy discretion and as they continue to merge-out their competition. The funny thing about this, currently the FCC does not regulate the rates, although this bill still is being introduced. Who is behind this?
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Government price controls are never a good idea. They stifle innovation, deprive companies of profit, lower wages for workers of said companies, and curtail sales pricing which benefit consumers. We already subsidize broadband in "underserved" communities by federal fiat, artificially inflating the price we pay our providers. Companies are incentivized to provide outstanding service by the potential for profit. Consumers need to realize that we get what we pay for, and sometimes flank steak will have to do when we want fillet. Perhaps Congress would be interested in regulating speaking fees and salaries of former members. No? Didn't think so.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes! Hands off the internet! Don't need the Feds anywhere near this last bastion of freedom. Look at China and the Internet.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Our internet rates are way too high as it is. We need more regulation on them not less.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    You should not ban regulation until the FCC regulate.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Different accessibility of Internet for different users. Simple as that. No need for regulation.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Let business do business and the competition will regulate itself. There's no need for government regulation if there's no risk of monopoly or oligopoly. And in this situation, there's no significant risk of that occurring.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    The internet providers are becoming trust and the anti trust laws are not being used and the bigger they grow the more we have to pay for their exctes to have million dollar bonuses
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    The control that these companies have, e.g. Verizon, is monopolistic in nature. Internet should be view as a utility and regulated that way.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    The ENTIRE POINT of the FCC is to regulate the electronics and communications market. It doesn't make sense now, it wouldn't make sense 20 years ago, and it wouldn't make sense in the future to keep it from fulfilling its primary goal!
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Let the market sort it out. The government has proven it's incompetence in the past.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    I find this FCC regulations somewhat confusing. Therefore I'll fall back on capitalism. Allow the competitive effects of business create a rate. Sounds like this could leave the taxpayer's paying for the less fortunate internet connections like Obama Phones.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    In 2014, the Progressive Policy Institute reported that the U.S broadband providers only made about 1/8 of the profits that corporations (Apple,Google,Twitter) who use their services made. That proves that there isn't unreasonable price gouging by the broadband providers. Instead of allowing the FCC to be regulating prices, we should be trying to increase competition and making it easier for smaller ISP companies to rise.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Let the Market dictate prices.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Market, not government! Why is this so hard?
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    I don't think it make sense to pass a potentially broad and far-reaching bill in order to prevent the FCC from doing something they already do not plan on doing. The FCC, as it stands, in our current economic/technological climate, does not want to regulate rates. Fine, then they won't, and Internet neutrality will be maintain. However, if ISPs begin abusing the consumer, the FCC may need to step in, and this bill would be rather inconvenient.
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE