Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 2311

Should Schools be Prohibited From 'Lunch Shaming' Children Unable to Pay for a Meal?

Argument in favor

It’s wrong for schools to discriminate against or stigmatize children because their parents haven’t paid their school meal bills. Lunch shaming should be prohibited.

Dave.Land's Opinion
···
06/19/2019
Why was it ever permitted in the first place? People of limited means suffer enough. We don’t need to add shame to their burden. Whatever happened to Americans lifting one another up and helping each other out?
Like (176)
Follow
Share
Mancos's Opinion
···
06/19/2019
Have any of you observed what happens in a school during lunch? I have observed kids who would rather go hungry than appear as though they need a government handout. Add to their shame by giving kids a “lesser lunch” than their peers. We held fundraisers so no child would be humiliated, nor their family.
Like (96)
Follow
Share
Kathi13's Opinion
···
06/19/2019
No child should go hungry and this kind of bullying is unconscionable.
Like (87)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

There’s nothing wrong with having children whose parents can’t pay for their meals at school do extra chores, this bill is a solution in search of a problem.

Mark's Opinion
···
06/19/2019
This is a state issue. Stop overreaching. Read the Constitution.
Like (55)
Follow
Share
ManfromNebraska's Opinion
···
06/19/2019
The federal government needs to stay out because it’s a local issue. There is nothing wrong with doing a little labor to help pay for the meal. We need to stop treating our children like marshmallows and start treating them like human beings. They need to learn to grow up and be responsible.
Like (25)
Follow
Share
Jim2423's Opinion
···
06/19/2019
Bring a lunch, my brothers and I packed our lunches and only bought holiday lunches. We were definitely not alone packing lunches.
Like (19)
Follow
Share

What is House Bill H.R. 2311?

This bill would prohibit schools from publicly identifying or otherwise stigmatizing children participating in the National School Lunch Program or the School Breakfast Program who either don’t have funds to pay for a meal or have an outstanding credit from a school food authority. Such children couldn’t be forced to wear a wristband or hand stamp, perform chores that other students aren’t generally assigned to, or dispose of food after it has been served to them.

Any communications related to outstanding credit would have to be directed to the child’s parent or guardian. A child may be required to deliver a letter regarding outstanding credit that’s addressed to the parent or guardian if the letter isn’t distributed in a way that stigmatizes the child.

This bill would also express the sense of Congress that schools should be provided with lunch or breakfast at school regardless of their ability to pay, those who can’t pay shouldn’t be provided an alternate meal, and schools should explore innovative ways to improve communications and payments with parents. It'd also request that the Secretary of Agriculture: 

  • Ensure the annual distribution of understandable, uniform applications for free or reduced price lunches and encourages school food authorities to offer assistance to complete the applications;
  • Coordinate with school food authorities and local education agency liaisons to ensure that homeless children and youth are eligible to receive a free or reduced price lunch;
  • Coordinate with state agencies responsible for foster children and youth to ensure that both are eligible to receive a free or reduced price lunch; and
  • Explore innovative ways to use technology to improve and coordinate communications between parent(s) or guardian(s) and school food authorities.

Impact

Children who would otherwise be lunch shamed; parents; school administrators and teachers.

Cost of House Bill H.R. 2311

A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.

More Information

In-Depth: Sponsoring Rep. Deb Haaland (D-NM), a member of the Task Force on Poverty and Opportunity, reintroduced this bill from the 115th Congress to prohibit school "lunch shaming," which is the practice of discriminating against or stigmatizing children who have outstanding credit or don't have enough money to pay for meals at school. Rep. Haaland says:

No child should have to worry about being hungry at school, but there are still places in this country with outdated policies that force children to bear the burden of poverty. In 2017, New Mexico took the lead on ending these harmful policies and now we’re working to ensure children across the country have full stomachs when they’re in school so they can reach their full learning potential.”

Senate sponsor Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM) adds

"Lunch shaming is a practice so cruel and backwards that most Americans would be shocked to know it happens. And yet school districts across the country are allowed to use these appalling tactics. Instead of stigmatizing kids who come from struggling households, withholding hot meals from students, and depriving some children of their only healthy meal of the day, we should be working to find solutions to end childhood hunger and to support families in need. We know that hunger can be an insurmountable barrier to success in the classroom. I was proud when New Mexico became the first state in the country to outlaw the practice of lunch shaming, and I will continue to do everything I can in the Senate to pass this legislation on a federal level so no child will have to spend their time at school feeling ashamed of a debt they have no power to pay.”

Last Congress, sponsoring Rep. Michelle Lujan Grisham (D-NM) introduced this bill to ban schools from “lunch shaming” — publicly singling out children through wristbands or chores if they can’t pay for school meals:

“No student should be humiliated in front of their peers because their parents can’t afford to pay for a meal. It is shocking and shameful that this happens to hungry children, but nearly half of all school districts use some form of lunch shaming. This bipartisan bill will put an end to these draconian practices and help ensure that students can focus on their studies without looking over their shoulder to see their friends pointing fingers.”

New Mexico Appleseed is one of the organizations sponsoring this bill. Its executive director, Jennifer Ramo, says: 

"There are few more powerful antidotes to the causes and consequences of child poverty than food and dignity. This important bill ensures that children receive the vital nutrition they need to focus in school through the national school lunch program. And, it ensures that they do so with their self-respect intact.  We have saved New Mexican children from the devastating effects of being humiliated and missing meals through our state’s Hunger-Free Student Bill of Rights, and now we are excited to see this protection extended nationally to all children in need."

The federal government, via U.S. Dept. of Agriculture regulations, requires school districts to seek payment for unpaid school lunch balances. However, it doesn't mandate how schools pursue this repayment. The School Nutrition Association's Diane Pratt-Heavne notes that after new guidelines requiring districts to address this issue were issued before the 2017-2018 school year, reports of school lunch shaming stories increased. However, the School Nutrition Association also notes, most districts avoid the practice of publicly identifying students with lunch debt in favor of using online payment programs, finding ways to contact parents about their debts other than through their children, or accepting charitable contributions. 

This bill has 14 bipartisan House cosponsors, including 11 Democrats and three Republicans, in the 116th Congress. A Senate companion bill, sponsored by Sen. Tom Udall (D-NM), has 13 bipartisan Senate cosponsors, including 11 Democrats and two Republicans.

Last Congress, this bill had the support of 147 bipartisan cosponsors in the House, including 130 Democrats and 17 Republicans, and didn't receive a committee vote. A Senate companion bill, sponsored by Sen. Udall, had 13 Democratic cosponsors and didn't see committee action last Congress.

FRAC, Feeding America, National PTA, Share our Strength, First Focus, Food Corps, New Mexico Appleseed, Hunger Task Force, MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger, UConn Rudd Center for Food Policy & Obesity, California Food Policy Advocates, New Mexico Voices for Children, Hunger Free Vermont, End Childhood Hunger – South Carolina, Hunger-Free Pennsylvania, Children’s Hunger Alliance, Arkansas Hunger Relief Alliance, Cultivating Community, Alabama Food Bank Association, Feed the Children, Hunger Free Oklahoma, Hunger Solutions New York, West Virginia Food & Farm Coalition, and Missoula Food Bank support this bill.


Of Note: Rep. Haaland introduced this bill in response to news that a Warwick, Rhode Island school district intended to give students with unpaid lunch debts a sunflower seed butter and jelly sandwich instead of hot foodIn a tweet in response, Rep. Haaland said: 
"Forcing children to bear the burden of poverty is wrong. NM took the lead to end harmful policies like this, and now I'm working to make sure no student has to face lunch shaming. #StandUpForKids"
Warwick school officials told the Providence Journal the policy is needed because the district is owned tens of thousands of dollars in lunch money, and is also contending with a budget deficit in the millions. Karen Bachus, the Warwick School Committee's chairwoman, says the district is owed over $40,000 in lunch money. Other school officials estimate the total is closer to $77,000. Due to a $4 million deficit, the Warwick school district has already cut back on janitorial services and is considering eliminating a popular mentoring program that doesn't have funding.
However, critics of the Warwick school district's policy — and of lunch shaming in general — argue that kids don't have control over their parents' finances, and shouldn't be stigmatized or potentially subjected to public humiliation because of their inability to pay. Heather Vale, a parent of two children in Warwick schools, says, "I just don’t think it’s fair to hold the kids responsible. I think it’s embarrassing to the kids because now everyone’s going to know why these children are receiving the lunch that they are.”
In lunch shaming episodes nationwide, students have been branded with stamps, given cheese sandwiches instead of hot meals, or even had their lunches thrown away after employees discovered they weren't current on their lunch payments. In 2015, a Colorado cafeteria worker said she'd been fired after giving free food to hungry elementary school students, one of whom had broken down in tears. Similarly, in 2016, Stacy Koltiska, a Pennsylvania school lunch worker, quit in protest after she was forced to refuse a hot meal to a student because he couldn't pay for it. Koltiska said, "As a Christian, I have an issue with this. It’s sinful and shameful is what it is."
A number of states, including New Mexico (the first state to pass such a law), Virginia, California, Hawaii, Oregon, Texas, Iowa, Washington, New York and Pennsylvania have laws on the books prohibiting lunch shaming. Rhode Island is considering similar legislation.

AKA

Anti-Lunch Shaming Act of 2019

Official Title

To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to prohibit the stigmatization of children who are unable to pay for meals.

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
  • The house has not voted
      house Committees
      Committee on Education and Labor
    IntroducedApril 12th, 2019
    Why was it ever permitted in the first place? People of limited means suffer enough. We don’t need to add shame to their burden. Whatever happened to Americans lifting one another up and helping each other out?
    Like (176)
    Follow
    Share
    This is a state issue. Stop overreaching. Read the Constitution.
    Like (55)
    Follow
    Share
    Have any of you observed what happens in a school during lunch? I have observed kids who would rather go hungry than appear as though they need a government handout. Add to their shame by giving kids a “lesser lunch” than their peers. We held fundraisers so no child would be humiliated, nor their family.
    Like (96)
    Follow
    Share
    No child should go hungry and this kind of bullying is unconscionable.
    Like (87)
    Follow
    Share
    Don’t shame children because their family is poor or not paying on time. The children are in no way responsible for their parents. If there are family issues forcing them into poverty- not the kids problem. If the family doesn’t pay on time- get after the family- not the kids problem. Let’s not brand them. Let’s help them get educated and responsible for the sake of their kids.
    Like (56)
    Follow
    Share
    It wouldn’t be fair for a student to have to do chores or pretty much be discriminated against because their parents couldn’t afford to pay for their lunches and breakfasts. Those students just need something to eat throughout the day and punishing them that way is cruel. Let this bill pass, please!
    Like (51)
    Follow
    Share
    Why do people want to shame children for things they have no control over and yet preach a 0 tolerance policy for bullying? Seems like they are the biggest bullies of all.
    Like (46)
    Follow
    Share
    It’s not the fault of the child that they live in a low income household nor is it the fault of their parents. It’s an economy that isn’t working for the working class and poor! Lunch shaming is poor shaming. Lunch should be free to every child in public schools!
    Like (43)
    Follow
    Share
    Were just a bully nation these days. It’s a shame that a so call Christian country has no real Christian values.
    Like (38)
    Follow
    Share
    I for one have lived several years on this kind of assistance during my young years so werw many children I grew up around. We were never shamed or put upon because of it. It helped me survive because of the lack of enough food at home. Enough is enough of this travesty for our country's children ond the world's children as well... No one should be without food, shelter and education.
    Like (30)
    Follow
    Share
    The federal government needs to stay out because it’s a local issue. There is nothing wrong with doing a little labor to help pay for the meal. We need to stop treating our children like marshmallows and start treating them like human beings. They need to learn to grow up and be responsible.
    Like (25)
    Follow
    Share
    Again I see comments that it is ok to punish children or ‘make them do chores’ in order to eat. Ya right let’s put 5-8 years to work because their parents are poor and shame the kids plus deny them food. What is wrong with people, do you have no compassion or empathy for children? It is our responsibility to protect and nurture children as a society and schools should not be allowed to prevent children from a meal due to money. I have become so discouraged by attitudes toward the poor, minorities, undocumented, etc. in this country and so many spouting this crap declare themselves Christian. Well you definitely don’t follow Jesus. The level of self righteousness and selfishness is beyond the pale.
    Like (25)
    Follow
    Share
    Kids have a tough enough time in school as it is why would anyone want to make them targets for any kind of Shame or ridicule
    Like (23)
    Follow
    Share
    Shaming children for being poor is the most dystopian BS I can think of right now.
    Like (21)
    Follow
    Share
    They. Are. Children. How does bullying a child who is already hungry help? I see the thought process, but how does it help?
    Like (19)
    Follow
    Share
    Bring a lunch, my brothers and I packed our lunches and only bought holiday lunches. We were definitely not alone packing lunches.
    Like (19)
    Follow
    Share
    It’s our kids for God’s sake....they shouldn’t be punished for the families they are born into. Every child should have the right to three meals a day and that should include healthy meals while attending school...which ironically is required by law(atleast where we live K-12 is mandatory for all kids.)
    Like (18)
    Follow
    Share
    Absolutely. Lunch shaming is a disgusting act and behavior performed by illegitimate people on this earth. Any person who shames a child for anything, should be imprisoned for a minimum of 1-year. Shaming causes psychological problems, that affect a child’s learning, social status among peers, issues at home and other problems. Those that lunch-shame are domestic terrorists and should be exported to Iran.
    Like (18)
    Follow
    Share
    As an adult I understand the sentiment behind the proposal to have kids do extra chores or use an alternate means of payment identification when on subsidized lunch. As a kid who experienced these things, I can tell you first hand how it feels to do so. Please pass this legislation.
    Like (17)
    Follow
    Share
    We should be providing high quality meals to all of our students by funding our schools and preschools at the levels our children deserve!
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE