Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 2075

Removing 832 Acres From a Wilderness Area in Oregon to Prevent Wildfire From Reaching an Adjacent Community

Argument in favor

This is a commonsense bill that’d allow crews to thin overstocked juniper that poses an extreme wildfire risk to the 5,500 resident community of Crooked River Ranch, Oregon by removing 832 acres from a wilderness area.

VAF's Opinion
···
07/11/2018
The government should NOT be owning land unless it has tourism value like Yosemite or the Grand Canyon. Private individuals know better how to manage the land than do bureaucrats in DC. Look at Maleure in Oregon. Good ranchers went to jail because DC in its land power grab decided to declare their prudent land management practices acts of terrorism. Thank God President Trump pardoned them.
Like (24)
Follow
Share
msorrentino's Opinion
···
07/11/2018
How about just allow for proper forest management practices without removing acreage from the wilderness area?
Like (22)
Follow
Share
SneakyPete's Opinion
···
07/11/2018
H.R. 2075 (Crooked River Ranch Fire Protection Act.) I’m in support of the bill H.R. 2075 - the Crooked River Ranch Fire Protection Act — which would require the Dept. of the Interior to adjust the eastern boundary of the Deschutes Canyon-Steelhead Falls Wilderness Study Area in Oregon to exclude 832 acres specified on an April 2017 map to facilitate fire prevention on those lands. Those activities would aim to protect the adjacent 5,500 resident community of Crooked River Ranch. These lands are classified in the highest risk category for wildfire due to overstocked juniper, but mechanical thinning (ie logging) of the juniper stands is currently prohibited because of its designation as a wilderness study area. This is a commonsense bill that’d allow crews to thin overstocked juniper that poses an extreme wildfire risk to the 5,500 resident community of Crooked River Ranch, Oregon by removing 832 acres from a wilderness area. 7*11*18 ..... SEE: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr2075/text
Like (5)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

This bill should at least make the remaining acreage a permanent wilderness area if it’s going to permanently remove 832 acres that’s currently protected. That’d allow for wildfire prevention and keep nearby lands as wilderness.

Ben's Opinion
···
07/11/2018
Past present and future development needs to be done prioritizing a thriving natural environment, destroying forests to prevent fires is cutting off your nose to spite your face
Like (89)
Follow
Share
Sean's Opinion
···
07/11/2018
Just one more way Trump privatizes our parks for profit ! Bullshit on this . It’s not about fire It’s about money
Like (61)
Follow
Share
Etb1025's Opinion
···
07/11/2018
Thin the juniper outside the bounds of the wilderness area. It is the fault if the towns builders and those that bought homes on the border. Make better decisions. If you had planned your town better you wouldn't have to ask for this...
Like (29)
Follow
Share
    The government should NOT be owning land unless it has tourism value like Yosemite or the Grand Canyon. Private individuals know better how to manage the land than do bureaucrats in DC. Look at Maleure in Oregon. Good ranchers went to jail because DC in its land power grab decided to declare their prudent land management practices acts of terrorism. Thank God President Trump pardoned them.
    Like (24)
    Follow
    Share
    Past present and future development needs to be done prioritizing a thriving natural environment, destroying forests to prevent fires is cutting off your nose to spite your face
    Like (89)
    Follow
    Share
    Just one more way Trump privatizes our parks for profit ! Bullshit on this . It’s not about fire It’s about money
    Like (61)
    Follow
    Share
    Thin the juniper outside the bounds of the wilderness area. It is the fault if the towns builders and those that bought homes on the border. Make better decisions. If you had planned your town better you wouldn't have to ask for this...
    Like (29)
    Follow
    Share
    How about just allow for proper forest management practices without removing acreage from the wilderness area?
    Like (22)
    Follow
    Share
    This sounds like it’s s good deal, but all it does is take our beautiful land that belongs to all the people & puts it in a situation where Trump can make money in it. The best money-making job Trump has had is the one he has now. Fleecing the taxpayers daily. A con man conning us again.
    Like (20)
    Follow
    Share
    Here are other ways to prevent wildfires besides tearing down the entire forest. You can use controlled burns, it will takes many years for the land to recover. Do not vote for this bill.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    Wilderness areas are imperative for the good of the world. People choose to live near wilderness areas and then want to essentially destroy them? It reminds me of people who moved near an established Pig Farm (Had been there for decades) because they liked the area and then tried to have the Pig Farm ousted 'cause they didn't like the smell.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    So we're just going to shrink protected lands every time someone builds a house outside of it? No. That's their fault. We shouldn't be developing in the immediate surroundings of protected public lands in the first place
    Like (11)
    Follow
    Share
    Opinion: Unless we plan to replenish these 800+ acres of nature somewhere else we should be leaving them be. If the neighboring community is nervous about forest fires reaching them then they can move themselves.
    Like (10)
    Follow
    Share
    Perminantly protect the rest of the forest and add minimum buffer zone of residential, commercial and industrial development around federal protected lands
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    Blatant land grab.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    These areas should not be razed. We must take better care of our natural world. These lands must be preserved to the best of our ability.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    This truly appears to be a thinly veiled method of logging protected land. I urge you to think very carefully about your grandchildren's ability to enjoy the earth - and the survival of the planet. I understand the desire to protect housing from fire - but we have to find sustainable long term ways to coexist with the rest of the natural world. This is a short term solution at best.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    I smell a rat. Sounds lovely or an Orwellian bill to me to allow privatization of public lands and beautiful wilderness for profit of the few.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    This is a giveaway to the lumber industry. This land is protected for a reason. Stop allowing big business to destroy the environment just to be able to make a bigger profit. It’s possible to have healthy businesses and a healthy economy without killing our planet. Support the economy and our planet, so we have a world worth living in to pass on to our kids.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    I don’t believe this has anything to do with fires, who can believe anything anymore! If this gets passed, watch and see how long it takes to get developed by someone who knows someone in the cabinet. Leave are land alone!
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    What BS. Trump just wants to opedn up more land for oil and gas.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    This area totals over 18,000 acres of land and this proposal wouldn’t put a dent into the protected area. However, I don’t ever like voting in favor of reducing protected lands and reserves.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    H.R. 2075 (Crooked River Ranch Fire Protection Act.) I’m in support of the bill H.R. 2075 - the Crooked River Ranch Fire Protection Act — which would require the Dept. of the Interior to adjust the eastern boundary of the Deschutes Canyon-Steelhead Falls Wilderness Study Area in Oregon to exclude 832 acres specified on an April 2017 map to facilitate fire prevention on those lands. Those activities would aim to protect the adjacent 5,500 resident community of Crooked River Ranch. These lands are classified in the highest risk category for wildfire due to overstocked juniper, but mechanical thinning (ie logging) of the juniper stands is currently prohibited because of its designation as a wilderness study area. This is a commonsense bill that’d allow crews to thin overstocked juniper that poses an extreme wildfire risk to the 5,500 resident community of Crooked River Ranch, Oregon by removing 832 acres from a wilderness area. 7*11*18 ..... SEE: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/115/hr2075/text
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE