Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 204

Should North Korea Be Labeled As A State Sponsor Of Terrorism?

Argument in favor

North Korea may not have actually sponsored terrorism, but its recent actions are unacceptable and should thus be subject to the restrictions that come with being on the list.

Loraki's Opinion
···
12/10/2016
I'm voting YEA but I think it will do little, if anything, to change things. The United Nations has become a sham, IMO. Also, North Korea is ruled by a psychopathic Communist megalomaniac, who clearly wants to be able to nuke his enemies, no matter what the cost. He really needs to be put down like the rabid dog he is!
Like (7)
Follow
Share
Kenneth's Opinion
···
02/27/2015
North Korea as it is presently governed supports terrorism in some ways. Providing arms to our enemies. Supporting countries that are hostile to the United States. These are enough actions to label them and sponsors of terrorism.
Like (5)
Follow
Share
Elinor's Opinion
···
03/24/2015
Who doesn't know this already? But, hey, Congress, do it anyway just to irritate the little rodent running their country.
Like (4)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

Although North Korea has done a lot to tick off the international community, it doesn’t actually sponsor terrorism. Wouldn’t we be sending mixed messages by putting them on that list?

tea's Opinion
···
02/21/2015
Putting North Korea on the list would make the title of the list kind of a misnomer. Plus, we already have a ton of sanctions on North Korea; putting them on the list of State Sponsors of Terrorism would have little effect.
Like (9)
Follow
Share
JoeyM's Opinion
···
05/22/2015
they aren't terrorists. they have a legitimate government (not liked though) and we don't even have Saudi Arabia, our biggest funder of terrorism.
Like (7)
Follow
Share
AndrewGVN's Opinion
···
10/19/2015
Just because we don't agree with them and have had small issues, doesn't mean they have a terrorist agenda.
Like (6)
Follow
Share
    I'm voting YEA but I think it will do little, if anything, to change things. The United Nations has become a sham, IMO. Also, North Korea is ruled by a psychopathic Communist megalomaniac, who clearly wants to be able to nuke his enemies, no matter what the cost. He really needs to be put down like the rabid dog he is!
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Putting North Korea on the list would make the title of the list kind of a misnomer. Plus, we already have a ton of sanctions on North Korea; putting them on the list of State Sponsors of Terrorism would have little effect.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    they aren't terrorists. they have a legitimate government (not liked though) and we don't even have Saudi Arabia, our biggest funder of terrorism.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Just because we don't agree with them and have had small issues, doesn't mean they have a terrorist agenda.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    North Korea as it is presently governed supports terrorism in some ways. Providing arms to our enemies. Supporting countries that are hostile to the United States. These are enough actions to label them and sponsors of terrorism.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Who doesn't know this already? But, hey, Congress, do it anyway just to irritate the little rodent running their country.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    North Korea isn't actually a state sponsor of terrorism. If the U.S. wants to place additional sanctions on DPRK, then they should do so separately. Putting them on the list would cause confusion regarding the purpose of the list.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    They have not actually sponsored any acts of terrorism
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Not just a sponsor. They are terrorists
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes because they do sponsor terrorism. They have been launching nuclear capable missiles threading the. US directly.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    North Korea, Iran, Saudi Arabia and The Sudan should all be on the sponsor of terrorism list.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Isn't it already? What happened to the so called axis of evil?
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    I cannot believe this country is not already on a list of countries that should be denied anything we have to offer simply based on the horrible ways their people are treated especially the criminals!
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    The should also be cut off from all aid! If communism is so great then let them prove it.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    They are a state that is terroristic in nature. Put them back on the list.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes, because they make no positive contribution to help their own people or the world. Their laws and practices are draconian and need to be revamped.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    I do not know why this is even a thing still. Cannot get into it here, but the intel is plentiful to make the connections of North Korea and terrorist sponsorship (and participation at the state level). This is only not yet done due to political motivations and has nothing to do with security. Rather than Iraq, we should have confronted Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and North Korea post 9/11. GW blew that out his ass, and the Legislature helped perpetuate it.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Historically, "terrorism" describes the actions of the state against its own people: see the French Revolution. Certainly applies here.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    And weren't they so labeled before Barack Naive Obalmy let them fall off the list to mollify his third world buddies in the UN?
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    History people, read it.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE