Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 1973

Should All USOC-Recognized Amateur Athletic Organizations be Mandatory Reporters of Sexual Abuse?

Argument in favor

USOC-recognized amateur athletic organizations and all people affiliated with them should be required to immediately report allegations of suspected sexual or physical abuse to law enforcement and have procedures in place to prevent such abuse.

Catherine's Opinion
···
05/25/2017
Anyone who works with children should be a mandated reporter.
Like (41)
Follow
Share
Abbi's Opinion
···
05/25/2017
Sorry, but if you work with kids you are a mandatory reporter. There are too many places where kids go that don't have background checks for employees and a vulnerable kid can become prey. I hate making things mandatory but these are kids and there are too many people covering up crimes. You can't always trust people to do the right thing.
Like (27)
Follow
Share
Wendell's Opinion
···
05/22/2017
That's a "no brainier". Wouldn't you want that for your own young person? I thought that already was law.
Like (19)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

There’s no need for USOC-recognized amateur athletic organizations and the people associated with them to be mandatory reporters, or have other policies in place to prevent the sexual or physical abuse of young athletes.

operaman's Opinion
···
05/22/2017
Mandatory? What a legal complexity this would expose. If abuse is not reported, legal civil suits may occur. If abuse is reported, the reporting person/organization better be sure the report is substantiated by police or civil judgment. A lawyers paradise either way.
Like (25)
Follow
Share
Gary's Opinion
···
05/23/2017
I get the idea, and these things need to be promptly reported. But the "mandatory" reporting of what one thinks is " reasonable" is a Pandora's box.
Like (5)
Follow
Share
PoliticalAmateur's Opinion
···
05/24/2017
Of course when a sexual assault occurs it should be reported. The problem is in requiring the organization to create training, oversight, etc. This is how business can't afford to operate.
Like (3)
Follow
Share

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
      senate Committees
      Committee on the Judiciary
  • The house Passed May 25th, 2017
    Roll Call Vote 415 Yea / 3 Nay
      house Committees
      Committee on Education and Labor
      The Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties
      Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security
      Committee on the Judiciary
    IntroducedApril 6th, 2017

Log in or create an account to see how your Reps voted!

Bill Activity

  • action
    Introduced in House
  • referral
    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • referral
    Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Education and the Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
  • referral
    Referred to the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Civil Justice.
  • referral
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, Homeland Security, and Investigations.
  • action
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  • calendar
    Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by Voice Vote.
  • action
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 115-136, Part I.
  • action
    Committee on Education and the Workforce discharged.
  • calendar
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 85.
  • action
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 352 Reported to House. The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on H.R. 1973 and H.R. 1761. The resolution provides for proceedings during the period from May 26, 2017 through June 5, 2017.
  • action
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 352.
  • action
    The resolution provides for one hour of general debate on H.R. 1973 and H.R. 1761. The resolution provides for proceedings during the period from May 26, 2017 through June 5, 2017.
  • action
    House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 352 and Rule XVIII.
  • action
    The Speaker designated the Honorable Bruce Poliquin to act as Chairman of the Committee.
  • action
    GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1973.
  • action
    The Committee of the Whole rose informally to receive a message from the Senate.
  • action
    Subsequently, the Committee resume its sitting.
  • action
    GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole resumed with general debate on H.R. 1973.
  • action
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 352, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Johnson (LA) amendment No. 1.
  • action
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 352, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Costa amendment No. 2.
  • action
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 352, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the O'Halleran amendment No. 3.
  • action
    The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1973.
  • action
    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  • action
    The House adopted the amendment in the nature of a substitute as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
  • action
    POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on H.R. 1973, the Chair put the question on passage and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Goodlatte demanded the yeas and nays, and the Chair postponed further proceedings on passage of the bill until later in the legislative day.
  • action
    Considered as unfinished business.
  • vote
    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 415 - 3 (Roll no. 285).
  • action
    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  • referral
    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
      senate Committees
      Committee on the Judiciary
  • The house Passed May 25th, 2017
    Roll Call Vote 415 Yea / 3 Nay
      house Committees
      Committee on Education and Labor
      The Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties
      Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security
      Committee on the Judiciary
    IntroducedApril 6th, 2017

Log in or create an account to see how your Reps voted!
    Anyone who works with children should be a mandated reporter.
    Like (41)
    Follow
    Share
    Mandatory? What a legal complexity this would expose. If abuse is not reported, legal civil suits may occur. If abuse is reported, the reporting person/organization better be sure the report is substantiated by police or civil judgment. A lawyers paradise either way.
    Like (25)
    Follow
    Share
    Sorry, but if you work with kids you are a mandatory reporter. There are too many places where kids go that don't have background checks for employees and a vulnerable kid can become prey. I hate making things mandatory but these are kids and there are too many people covering up crimes. You can't always trust people to do the right thing.
    Like (27)
    Follow
    Share
    That's a "no brainier". Wouldn't you want that for your own young person? I thought that already was law.
    Like (19)
    Follow
    Share
    I can't believe this isn't already a law. Teachers, day care providers, nurses, and foster parents are mandated reporters. Why aren't coaches?
    Like (14)
    Follow
    Share
    Anyone working with kids should be a mandatory reporter if they become aware of child abuse.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    Mandatory reporters cannot be sued if the allegations are proved false. The allegations are investigated by the local CPS all of which are confidential. Better safe than sorry with minors. It may prevent future Sanduskis.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    Sexual abuse should be reported by every organization involved with children
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Anyone who deals with children should be mandatory reporters. The biggest issue I see raised by the opposition is the risk of legal battles that could arise if concerns were unsubstantiated. That is absurd as daycare and Sunday school teaches are already mandatory reporters. As long as the youth sports staff and volunteers are provided the same legal protections as everyone else this concern is invalid. Children need to be protected.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    OF COURSE THEY NEED TO REPORT SEXUAL ABUSE !! THIS IS A PERFECTLY STUPID QUESTION !!!
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Sexual Abuse should be reported whether or not it is aimed towards just children or adults. The bill tries to attack the issue from different angles aiming to amend Subchapter IV Reporting Requirement as well as other Chapters in the USCODE that deal with definitions of governing body and repercussions for not reporting sexual abuse. I think it is also important to address peoples who have been wrongfully accused of sexual abuse. The proposed amendment to that is still a bit vague and could lead to some issues down the road. To those who are concerned that the bill would weigh to heavily on adult amateur athletes, it specifically aims that portion of the amendment towards amateur athletes that are minors. Overall I think this bill is heading in the right direction.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Sexual abuse of children should be reported no matter who you are.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    EVERYBODY should be mandated to report on sexual abuse of a minor.
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    I get the idea, and these things need to be promptly reported. But the "mandatory" reporting of what one thinks is " reasonable" is a Pandora's box.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Why is this even in question? YES! We cannot trust people to do the right thing on their own.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    Private entities have a mixed record on sex crimes. This will put additional pressure on them to prevent abuse.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    This needs a vote? Seriously?!
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Legislating common sense again.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    Civil liability is already there
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    If someone is aware that a coach is abusing a child and does not report it, they are just as guilty as the perpetrator.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE