Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 1899

Should Licenses to Manufacture, Distribute, or Dispense Controlled Substances be Terminated When Registrants Cease to Exist?

Argument in favor

Loose restrictions on registrations to manufacture, distribute, and dispense controlled substances contributed heavily to the opioid crisis. Ensuring that these registrations are canceled when their holders die, cease existing as legal entities, or surrender their registrations is an important means of keeping opioids out of the hands of wrongdoers.

Carina's Opinion
···
04/16/2021
Yes, this should be the case. When a participant passes away the record and license should be closed just like when someone passes away their name should be permanently removed from the voter rolls.
Like (7)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

Limiting the transfer of licenses to manufacture, distribute, or dispense controlled substances could impede the operations of healthcare providers, pharmacies, and drug manufacturers. Controlling the opioid crisis will be better done at the point of use, such as by limiting overprescription of these highly addictive substances.

Melissa's Opinion
···
04/16/2021
The people this will harm most is those who depend on these drugs to live a functional, pain free life. If you want to go after the authors of the opoid crisis, you'd be far more accurate going after the companies that at best, knew and downplayed the addictivness of these drugs for profit, and at worst manufactured the crisis in it's entirety to feed their greed, by selling the drugs, as well as their antidotes, at premium prices.
Like (3)
Follow
Share
    Yes, this should be the case. When a participant passes away the record and license should be closed just like when someone passes away their name should be permanently removed from the voter rolls.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Most businesses have people who take over legally when an owner dies so that the entity itself will continue to live on. And then there are stockholders who own part of the businesses. The only exception I know of is when there is a partnership set up and a partner dies. Even at that, the partnership is renamed without the deceased partner and it would cease to exist and a new partnership formed. So, unless the agreement is with an individual, I'd say it might be complicated, and perhaps impossible, to disbar their drug related functions merely because of a death of an owner.
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    Judy nailed it. But this law and many others don’t stop companies like Perdue Para from profiting from the American people, even when they knew they were killing American while they bathed in luxury.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    The people this will harm most is those who depend on these drugs to live a functional, pain free life. If you want to go after the authors of the opoid crisis, you'd be far more accurate going after the companies that at best, knew and downplayed the addictivness of these drugs for profit, and at worst manufactured the crisis in it's entirety to feed their greed, by selling the drugs, as well as their antidotes, at premium prices.
    Like (3)
    Follow
    Share
    No brainer Now to important stuff-fix the rose garden The beautiful rose garden needs to be restored
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Save lives! Great bill!
    Like (2)
    Follow
    Share
    Makes sense should close these loopholes.
    Like (1)
    Follow
    Share
    Good job
    Like
    Follow
    Share
    You mean they actually had to vote on this? Wow!
    Like
    Follow
    Share
    Yes
    Like
    Follow
    Share
    If they no longer exist, who is manufacturing the drugs? This doesn't make sense.
    Like
    Follow
    Share
    I cannot sell my drivers license to anyone else, or leave it in my will.: why should companies be able to transfer licenses when many more lives than a single driver can touch are at risk?
    Like
    Follow
    Share