Like Causes?

Install the App
TRY NOW

house Bill H.R. 1140

Should Frontline TSA Workers Be Managed Under the Same Personnel System as Other Federal Employees?

Argument in favor

This bill would finally increase pay and workforce protections for Transportation Security Officers, who are among the lowest-paid federal employees, in addition to addressing the chronically low morale and high turnover at the Transportation Security Administration.

burrkitty's Opinion
···
03/05/2020
The TSA isn’t much more than a elaborate security theatre in my mind, but sure pay the people a living wage for their work. It doesn’t make sense to me that TSA is somehow separate from other federal employees. Treat them the same!
Like (63)
Follow
Share
Hillary's Opinion
···
03/05/2020
I'm tired of seeing workers stepped on in order for rich people to get richer.
Like (46)
Follow
Share
rixalot's Opinion
···
03/05/2020
The idea that paying TSA workers a living wage and giving them benefits would compromise national security is asinine. People who are feel that they are being treated fairly are more likely to be reliable, cooperative, and provide better service. People who are financially stressed are more likely to be distracted. I would argue that paying them so little is more of a threat to national security.
Like (26)
Follow
Share

Argument opposed

It may be well-intended, but this bill would undermine the TSA’s national security mission by preventing the agency from addressing instances of serious misconduct, such as knowingly allowing a weapon to pass through security, through one-step removal.

Bill's Opinion
···
03/05/2020
The TSA should be abolished entirely and a better solution for preventing terrorist actions found.
Like (39)
Follow
Share
David's Opinion
···
03/05/2020
Our TSA security should involve profiling. The security they have in Isreal is great without impeding air travelers. Our government has bought into political correctness, which is undermining our whole constitution! This should not be. Return to what worked for our nation for the first 200 years!
Like (21)
Follow
Share
Lindsey's Opinion
···
03/05/2020
We should absolutely look for ways to increase wages and benefits for TSA agents, but not at the risk of lowering our standards for security.
Like (16)
Follow
Share

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
  • The house Passed March 5th, 2020
    Roll Call Vote 230 Yea / 171 Nay
    IntroducedFebruary 11th, 2019

Log in or create an account to see how your Reps voted!

Bill Activity

  • Floor
    Mrs. Lesko moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on Homeland Security. (text: CR H1517)
  • Floor
    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1515-1519)
  • Floor
    Considered as unfinished business. (consideration: CR H1508-1514; text: CR H1509)
  • IntroReferral
    Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
  • Floor
    Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
  • Floor
    On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 230 - 171 (Roll no. 90).
  • Floor
    On motion to recommit with instructions Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 227 - 175 (Roll no. 89).
  • Floor
    The previous question on the motion to recommit with instructions was ordered without objection.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - The House proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Lesko motion to recommit with instructions. The instructions contained in the motion seek to require the bill to be reported back to the House with an amendment adding at the end of section 4 the rule of construction which states the Secretary shall ensure that the Transportation Security Administration continues to prevent the hiring of individuals who have been convicted of a sex crime, and offense involving a minor, a crime of violence, or terrorism.
  • Floor
    Mrs. Lesko moved to recommit with instructions to the Committee on Homeland Security.
  • Floor
    The House adopted the amendments en gross as agreed to by the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union.
  • Floor
    The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.
  • Floor
    The House rose from the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union to report H.R. 1140.
  • Floor
    The House resolved into Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union for further consideration.
  • Floor
    Considered as unfinished business.
  • Floor
    Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1140 as unfinished business.
  • Floor
    On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
  • Floor
    Mr. Thompson (MS) moved that the Committee rise.
  • Floor
    POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Mucarsel-Powell amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Thompson (MS) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 877, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Mucarsel-Powell amendment No. 9.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 877, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Spanberger amendment No. 8.
  • Floor
    POSTPONED PROCEEDINGS - At the conclusion of debate on the Cisneros amendment, the Chair put the question on adoption of the amendment, and by voice vote announced that the ayes had prevailed. Mr. Thompson (MS) demanded a recorded vote and the Chair postponed further proceedings until a time to be announced.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 877, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Cisneros amendment No. 7.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 877, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Kim amendment No. 6.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 877, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Brown (MD) amendment No. 5.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 877, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Peters amendment No. 4.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 877, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rose (NY) amendment No. 2.
  • Floor
    DEBATE - Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 877, the Committee of the Whole proceeded with 10 minutes of debate on the Rogers (AL) amendment No. 1.
  • Floor
    Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union rises leaving H.R. 1140 as unfinished business.
  • Floor
    On motion that the Committee rise Agreed to by voice vote.
  • Floor
    Mr. Thompson (MS) moved that the Committee rise.
  • Floor
    GENERAL DEBATE - The Committee of the Whole proceeded with one hour of general debate on H.R. 1140.
  • Floor
    The Speaker designated the Honorable Henry Cuellar to act as Chairman of the Committee.
  • Floor
    House resolved itself into the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union pursuant to H. Res. 877 and Rule XVIII.
  • Floor
    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1140 with 1 hour of general debate. Motion to recommit with or without instructions allowed. The resolution provides that it shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of March 5, 2020, for the Speaker to enterain motions that the House suspend the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV, relating to a measure making supplemental appropriatious for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2020.
  • Floor
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 877.
  • Floor
    Rule H. Res. 877 passed House.
  • Floor
    Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 877. (consideration: CR H1485-1489)
  • Floor
    Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1140 with 1 hour of general debate. Motion to recommit with or without instructions allowed. The resolution provides that is shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of March 5, 2020, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV, relating to a measure making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2020.
  • Floor
    Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 877 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of H.R. 1140 with 1 hour of general debate. Motion to recommit with or without instructions allowed. The resolution provides that is shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of March 5, 2020, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules as though under clause 1 of rule XV, relating to a measure making supplemental appropriations for fiscal year ending Sept. 30, 2020.
  • Committee
    Supplemental report filed by the Committee on Homeland Security, H. Rept. 116-398, Part II.
  • Floor
    SUPPLEMENTAL FILING AUTHORITY - Ms. Underwood asked unamious consent that the Committee on Homeland Security be authorized to file a supplemental report on H.R. 1140. Agreed to without objection.
  • Calendars
    Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 320.
  • Discharge
    Committee on Oversight and Reform discharged.
  • Committee
    Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Homeland Security. H. Rept. 116-398, Part I.
  • Committee
    Ordered to be Reported (Amended).
  • Committee
    Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security Discharged.
  • Committee
    Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.
  • Committee
    Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
  • IntroReferral
    Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

bill Progress


  • Not enacted
    The President has not signed this bill
  • The senate has not voted
  • The house Passed March 5th, 2020
    Roll Call Vote 230 Yea / 171 Nay
    IntroducedFebruary 11th, 2019

Log in or create an account to see how your Reps voted!
    The TSA isn’t much more than a elaborate security theatre in my mind, but sure pay the people a living wage for their work. It doesn’t make sense to me that TSA is somehow separate from other federal employees. Treat them the same!
    Like (63)
    Follow
    Share
    The TSA should be abolished entirely and a better solution for preventing terrorist actions found.
    Like (39)
    Follow
    Share
    I'm tired of seeing workers stepped on in order for rich people to get richer.
    Like (46)
    Follow
    Share
    The idea that paying TSA workers a living wage and giving them benefits would compromise national security is asinine. People who are feel that they are being treated fairly are more likely to be reliable, cooperative, and provide better service. People who are financially stressed are more likely to be distracted. I would argue that paying them so little is more of a threat to national security.
    Like (26)
    Follow
    Share
    Our TSA security should involve profiling. The security they have in Isreal is great without impeding air travelers. Our government has bought into political correctness, which is undermining our whole constitution! This should not be. Return to what worked for our nation for the first 200 years!
    Like (21)
    Follow
    Share
    God afternoon all, My name is Gino Morales, as a TSA employee I feel it’s time to put this agency under title 5. This bill (HR 1140) would allow that to happen. Every agency under the DHS umbrella has these rights that give federal employees a better pay scale (GS) and also benefits that would assist more in each employees livelihood. As you may be aware we experienced a furlough that lasted 35 total days. Even though our employees were not getting paid they still maintained the TSA oath and protected the flying public. They train to sacrifice their lives everyday , the fact is we are here to detect for explosives, prohibited items and weapons of mass destruction. It’s a dangerous job for all our employees, yet we are the lowest paid employees in the federal sector, we also have the least amount of benefits available to us. In the 16 years since 9/11 a plane has not gone down, that’s a testament to all Officers who sacrifice their lives every single for the mission, but are not given the same benefits and pay as the rest of the federal government. It’s time for change. Many of our federal officers utilize public assistance just to attempt to get by, I find it as a disrespect not only to me, but also to the government that we have our Officers having to reach out to public assistance just to get by in their daily lives. It’s time for a change, title 5 (hr 1140) will support the men and women who sacrifice their lives for the mission not only of TSA, but our proud government. As a federal employee and a constituent of the great state of Pennsylvania I am asking you to support HR 1140.
    Like (19)
    Follow
    Share
    We should absolutely look for ways to increase wages and benefits for TSA agents, but not at the risk of lowering our standards for security.
    Like (16)
    Follow
    Share
    We have always wondered why the TSA people worked for the Airline instead of the government. It’s a very important job & dangerous at times. They need better training & better psh to care for the safety of the people who take planes.
    Like (15)
    Follow
    Share
    Yes, absolutely, this needs to be fixed, as well as the failing ACQDEMO federal pay scale. All federal employees should be paid using the GS scale, and paid properly for the job they are doing.
    Like (15)
    Follow
    Share
    Why would one level of Federal Employee assuming similar risks be treated differently than others? Despite trumps desire for us to embrace India, we do not have caste systems here... yet.
    Like (15)
    Follow
    Share
    Maybe but we should have real facts and not a little descriptive language. TSA employees are represented by the AFGE Union. TSO’s make between $15 and $24 an hour (according to my research) which isn’t a lot of money but generally referred to as a living wage considering the prerequisites are being 18 and have a high school diploma. They also receive the full package of heath insurance, dental, eye, life insurance, personal and sick leave, flexible schedule and tuition reimbursement so that they can use their work as a bridge to a different career if desired. One thing they don’t get that federal employees get is months to be fired if they are caught putting travelers in danger on purpose. If we want to roll them into the normal federal system by all means, but there’s a reason they weren’t in the first place so let’s think about it as a whole.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    They are the pure definition of unskilled labor. As Bloomberg put it “you can train any one to do it.” 90% of federal employment jobs need axed. I’ve yet to see any federal or state job that could not be privatized and it be done with more efficiency, at a lower cost, more accurately with greater results.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    Keep TSA standards & ethics high, pay workers a livable wage, & manage them like every other Federal employee.
    Like (9)
    Follow
    Share
    TSA workers should receive all the benefits of all other federal workers. Their jobs are very valuable and they should be paid and treated well.
    Like (8)
    Follow
    Share
    Unions made this country great. We need to organize more people in order to improve the working and middle class. Unions or Associations do a lot of great work for the American people.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Most of the TSA "security" positions should be eliminated. For the most part they accomplish nothing other than infuriating passengers and slowing down boarding times.
    Like (7)
    Follow
    Share
    Why not?
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    The Rights for Transportation Security Officers Act of 2020 — would reform the Transportation Security Administration’s (TSA) personnel system to expand the benefits and workplace protections. They are indirectly federal employees and are the front line of defense of the port of entry and domestic flights. They should have the benefits and workplace safety as all people. They are exposed to all source of hazards (as well as health) and should have the same protection, as what unions give to their members. TSA should fall under May be the FAA or FBI
    Like (6)
    Follow
    Share
    I disagree with your Nay vote Montana Rep Gianforte ! Front lines for security is A BIG DEAL and sacrifice of self bc of unexpected hazards and danger! I worked as a nurse 35 years and did not feel fully compensated for my frontline duties! It is worse now!! Senators, please think this through! The mind set of: profiteering by low pay to private business employees, is the wrong way to vote! This is a BIG problem for supporting workers on the front lines, literally! Very relevant these days!
    Like (5)
    Follow
    Share
    I think what is needed are higher standards in order to get a job with the TSA. In the past I’ve seen sloppy searches, carelessness, and bad attitudes. They are the first step in keeping the public safe. They must be aware of how vitality important they are, and awarded for service above and beyond. They should also be punished for poor service, poor performance, and bad attitudes. It is essential that people working in these positions, that don’t pay the highest wages. Know They Are Appreciated. Studies have shown that most people are dissatisfied with their jobs and leave, not because of money, but because of lack of appreciation Managers should be trained, to recognize, not just top performers, but also the ones that show up on time every day and do their jobs. An acknowledgment is sometimes more appreciated then even a small pay raise. To get back to the original question, I think things should stay as they are.
    Like (4)
    Follow
    Share
    MORE