BILL: Banning TikTok - The RESTRICT Act - S.686

Contact Your Reps: Do you support a ban on TikTok?

  • 9,423


    People have no idea how their data is being used against them and there is a whistleblower saying the company is lying to the US about its data collection and use.

    This is not a personal rights issue, it's a national security issue. And I wouldn't be far behind on throwing the American companies under the bus as well. Trying to get companies to do better, it's too late for all that. We need to follow the European model and enact internet laws.

  • 4,082
    Voted Oppose

    In 2022 TikTok killed zero children.

    In 2022 guns injured 1300 children and killed 300 under the age of 11.

    Let's see what's the biggest problem here? The biggest problem is that Republicans Wusses. They will jump right on the bandwagon of some thing that means less than nothing but when it comes to really doing something about a problem you can't find them. That's the Republican party the do-nothing party.

  • 96.4k
    Voted Support

    Montana becomes the 1st US state to ban Tik Tok beginning 1-1-24 when mobile app stores will be prohibited from offering TikTok to users with a penalty of $10,000 for each violation and an additional $10,000 fee for each day the violation continues.

    27 states and the US Government have banned Tik Tok on government devices but this is the 1st time it's been banned on all devices and a test of the legal cases that are sure to be filed and expected to be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court,

    "The bill was passed by the state House in a 54–43 vote and now heads to Gov. Greg Gianforte's desk. If Gianforte signs it into law, Montana will become the first state to ban the app outright. (Both the federal government and many states, including Montana, have already forbidden the app on government devices.)"

    "The legislation, which would take effect on Jan. 1, 2024, prohibits mobile app stores from offering TikTok to users and enacts penalties of $10,000 for each violation and an additional $10,000 fee for each day the violation continues."

    "We’re under no illusions that this is not going to get challenged,” Montana Attorney General Austin Knudsen told the New York Times in a recent interview. “I think this is the next frontier in First Amendment jurisprudence that’s probably going to have to come from the US Supreme Court. And I think that’s probably where this is headed.”"

  • 8,206

    I support National Security & problem solving. Why can't a US based company create their own Tik Tok? Problem solved. 

  • 49.9k
    Voted Oppose

    I don't use TikTok, so I don't really care.

    I am concerned about its seeming effects on young users, since apparently the algorithms work differently in the USA than they do in China where its' owned and programmed. That makes me think maybe banning it would be a good thing.

    Since I'm not using it, I'm not concerned about whether it's monitoring my data. However, I can see that's a concern for some.

    The Congress and President have every right to ban a private company for any reason so long as their constituents approve. I guess we'll see what happens.

  • 96.4k
    Voted Support

    Pinduoduo, a Chinese shopping app founded in 2015 with 3x the user base and market valuation of eBay, found to have many security problems and has been suspended from the Google App Store.

    According to cybersecurity researchers, it can bypass users' cell phone security to monitor activities on other apps, check notifications, read private messages and change settings, and once installed, hard to remove.


    "November 2022, researchers at Google’s Project Zero warned about active attacks on Samsung mobile phones which chained together three security vulnerabilities that Samsung patched in March 2021, and which would have allowed an app to add or read any files on the device."

    "On Feb. 28, 2023, researchers at the Chinese security firm DarkNavy published a blog postpurporting to show evidence that a major Chinese ecommerce company’s app was using this same three-exploit chain to read user data stored by other apps on the affected device, and to make its app nearly impossible to remove. DarkNavy likewise did not name the app they said was responsible for the attacks"

    "On March 3, 2023, a denizen of the now-defunct cybercrime communityBreachForums posted a thread which noted that a unique component of the malicious app code highlighted by DarkNavy also was found in the ecommerce application whose name was apparently redacted from the DarkNavy analysis: Pinduoduo."

    "On March 4, 2023, e-commerce expert Liu Huafang posted on the Chinese social media network Weibo that Pinduoduo’s app was using security vulnerabilities to gain market share by stealing user data from its competitors. That Weibo post has since been deleted."

    "On March 7, the newly created Github account Davinci1010 published a technical analysisclaiming that until recently Pinduoduo’s source code included a “backdoor,” a hacking term used to describe code that allows an adversary to remotely and secretly connect to a compromised system at will. That analysis includes links to archived versions of Pinduoduo’s app released before March 5 (version 6.50 and lower), which is when Davinci1010 says a new version of the app removed the malicious code"


    "While many apps collect vast troves of user data, sometimes without explicit consent, experts say e-commerce giant Pinduoduo has taken violations of privacy and data security to the next level."

    " TelAviv-based cyber firm Check Point Research, Delaware-based app security startup Oversecured and Hyppönen's WithSecure conducted independent analysis of the 6.49.0 version of the app,"

    "The researchers found code designed to achieve "privilege escalation": a type of cyberattack that exploits a vulnerable operating system to gain a higher level of access to data than it's supposed to have, according to experts."

    "Our team has reverse engineered that code and we can confirm that it tries to escalate rights, tries to gain access to things normal apps wouldn't be able to do on Android phones"

    "The app was able to continue running in the background and prevent itself from being uninstalled, which allowed it to boost its monthly active user rates, Hyppönen said. It also had the ability to spy on competitors by tracking activity on other shopping apps and getting information from them, he added."

    "The app deployed a method that allowed it to push updates without an app store review process meant to detect malicious applications, the researchers said."

    "They also identified in some plug-ins the intent to obscure potentially malicious components by hiding them under legitimate file names, such as Google's."

    "According to Toshin, the exploits allowed Pinduoduo access to users' locations, contacts, calendars, notifications and photo albums without their consent. They were also able to change system settings and access users' social network accounts and chats, he said."

    "Such a technique is widely used by malware developers that inject malicious code into applications that have legitimate functionality,"

    "Pinduoduo has not yet responded to requests for comment. Pinduoduo parent company PDD Holdings told Reuters Google has not shared details about why it suspended the app."

  • 215
    Voted Oppose

    This is ABSURD. This is congress destroying tuhe competition for facebook!!!


    This will kill the youth vote.... organizing tuere is incredibly fruitful. If YOU CARE about being elected dont fall for this!!!


    Facebook is FAAAAAR MORE DANGEROUS. Tye kids are adept attearing through propaganda...its everyone over 40 on Facebook tyat gobbles it up uncritically 7/24/365.


    If anyone should be blocked from using or legislation on social medi it should be the ignoramuses spreading Putins disinfo on FB???????




    If I could block anyones use of the internet it wouldbe people between 45-80... and Im 60. This demographic haz ZERO KEDIA LITERACY...AND IT IS GETTING PEOPLE KILLED. 1 Million US citizens to be exact due to COVID.



  • 55
    Voted Oppose

    The ban on TikTok will interfere with free enterprise. So I oppose it. 

  • 43
    Voted Oppose

    This app is valuable to me in so many ways. It's entertaining and informative and I don't want it banned.

  • 32
    Voted Oppose

    This Would Kill THe INternet!  Nuff Said!

  • 51
    Voted Oppose

    I fully oppose the restrict act as a Republican voter who vote for republicans like yourself s in the state of Iowa I want to NOT SUPPORT THIS HORRIBLE BILL!!

  • 158
    Voted Oppose

    Significant concerns. Instead of passing this broad and overreaching bill, Congress should limit the opportunities for any company to collect massive amounts of our detailed personal data, which is then made available to data brokers, U.S. government agencies, and even foreign adversaries, China included. Congress should solve the real problem of out-of-control privacy invasions by enacting comprehensive consumer data privacy legislation

    I urge you to vote NO

  • 53
    Voted Oppose

    TikTok is free speech. As far as "spying" on us, so does every other app, government agency, etc. TikTok is free speech. 

  • 41
    Voted Oppose

    I don't like Tik Tok, but this bill is a pure power grab. 

  • 31

    Its wrong and invading our privacy 

  • 244
    Voted Oppose

    Why when our own govt can spy so easily on us already?!?!?

  • 36
    Voted Oppose

    This is an infringement on the 1st amendment

  • 36
    Voted Oppose

    This Bill is an infringement on the 1st amendment

  • 68
    Voted Support

    TikTok should be banned due to concerns over data privacy and national security. These concerns stem from the fact that TikTok is owned by a Chinese company called ByteDance, which could potentially allow the Chinese government to access data on US users. Additionally, there are concerns that TikTok could be used for disinformation or propaganda campaigns. Some countries, such as India and Pakistan, have already banned TikTok for these reasons.

  • 1,358
    Voted Oppose

    I don't support a Tik Tok ban but would support much stronger legislation for all of social media. Social media should operate under the system as that governing newspapers, magazines and broadcast networks 

  • 50
    Voted Oppose

    Please do not pass this bill. Privacy is a sovereign right. You have no right intruding as such. 

  • 26.9k
    Voted Oppose


    Oppose the new bill forbidding kids access to social media apps, either it's just bullshit or requires everyone to provide ID to get online. Providing IDs is unacceptable.


  • 93
    Voted Oppose

    This act goes far beyond banning TikTok and instead allows the government to completely invade our lives. Not since the Patriot Act have we seen such BS. No!

  • 8,104

    Tik Tok, like Fox entertainment (News), will eventually have to answer for their product, what they produce and why. If it is not for the good of society, it's a house of cards, a web of deceit and it will fail, Time, history and truth will win!

    Fox can not afford to have a loose cannon on air digging a deeper hole!

  • 60
    Voted Support

    I see no value in TicTok that is worth the risk of compromising American data and security. Ban sites that put American values and security at risk, domestic or foreign. AND take immediate action against any elected official who does not support American Data and information security. Thank you, from our children who want a safe, strong America.

  • 4,082
    Voted Oppose

    This has nothing to do with the TikTok being banned but it's equally as stupid, what are rednecks going to do without Bud Light? L O L. They wouldn't drink anything else!