Causes.com
| 2.1.23

FDA Eases ‘Outdated’ Restrictions on Blood Donations From Gay Men
Contact the FDA with your reaction
What's the story?
- After years of protests from activists and blood bank workers, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has proposed an easing of the restrictions on blood donations from gay and bisexual men who are in monogamous relationships, allowing them to donate blood for the first time since 1985.
What are the new guidelines?
- Under new guidelines announced by the FDA on Friday, gay and bisexual men will no longer have to abstain from sex to donate blood.
- Any individual, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, who has had anal sex with a new partner or multiple partners will have to wait three months before donating blood.
- The FDA’s revised approach focuses less on a person’s sexual identity and more on the sexual behaviors that increase risk of HIV like unsafe sex and multiple partners.
- Canada and the U.K. have made similar changes to their protocols in recent years.
- FDA Commissioner Robert M. Califf said of the decision:
“[D]onating blood is one of several really important symbolic methods of demonstrating one’s caring for other people. We want to make that available to everyone possible in the context of a safe blood supply.”
What were the old guidelines?
- When the AIDS epidemic emerged in the 1980s, thousands of people who had received blood transfusions became infected, triggering stringent FDA rules.
- In 1985 the agency implemented a lifetime ban on blood donations from men who had had sex with another man from 1977 onwards.
- LGBT activists have long urged the FDA to reexamine the restrictions, arguing that they are homophobic and outdated.
How have the guidelines evolved?
- The FDA lifted the lifetime ban in 2015, changing the rules so that men who wanted to donate had to abstain from sex for a year prior to donating blood.
- The deferral period was further reduced to three months in April 2020 as the coronavirus led to national blood shortages.
What prompted the change?
- The American Medical Association and blood banks have argued that the restrictions are not necessarily effective at keeping the blood supply safe.
- Technological advancements and medical improvements have also made the prohibitions outdated. All blood donated in the U.S. is tested for HIV with a nucleic acid test which can detect the virus within 10 to 33 days of infection. The three-month waiting period is an extra precaution.
- The change comes in light of continued blood shortages due to the coronavirus. America’s Blood Centers, a group that operates multiple blood banks in the country, stated that half of their banks have less than two days’ supply of blood rather than the recommended three to five days supply.
What are the criticisms?
- Some activists argue that the waiting period of three months after anal sex still stigmatizes gay men.
- There is no exception to this waiting period, even for men who can present a negative HIV test.
- Anyone taking medications to treat or prevent HIV, including PrEP, would not be eligible to donate, which some activists say is unnecessarily restrictive.
What's next?
- The FDA is expected to adopt the proposal after a period of public comment.
- Newly eligible gay and bisexual donors will likely have to wait until the end of the year while the changes are implemented and finalized.
—Emma Kansiz
(Photo Credit: Vegasjon)
The Latest
-
Trump Indicted by Manhattan Grand JuryUpdated March 30, 2023 A Manhattan grand jury voted Thursday to indict Former President Donald Trump for his role in paying hush read more... Law Enforcement
-
GOP Lawmakers Attempting To Restrict College Student Voting RightsWhat’s the story? Republican lawmakers are attempting to create voting barriers for young voters and college students, many of read more... Civil Rights
-
U.S. Reporter Detained in Russia, Accused of EspionageWhat’s the story? U.S. citizen and reporter for the Wall Street Journal, Evan Gershkovich, has been detained on espionage read more... Russia
-
IT: Philly's chemical spill, and... Will you stand together to protect our kids?Welcome to Thursday, March 30th, dear readers... We open with an emotional plea from Causes' CEO, Bart Myers... I have two kids. read more...
I frankly do not know the reliabilty of blood testing to identify HIV in a sample - so I accept the FDA's conclusion that this is not a factor that could taint any statistically significant portion of donated blood.
That said, it is time to stop marginalizing gay men with restrictions that no longer represent any potential risk and do not serve any meaningful purpose.
It's about time. We've known for years that donating blood was low-risk for men in monogamous relationships or who had not had sex with other men in the recent past, but once again some people's religious ideology led them to discriminating against gay blood donors.
At a time when fewer and fewer are choosing to donate blood, which medical facilities desperately need, it's good to try to bring new donors into the fold.
Even so, all blood is screened after donation, so any infected blood would have been discovered before being given to a patient, so there was no great reason for this to begin with.
This action by the FDA is reasonable and rational and should have been taken years ago.
Good to see FDA updating regulations for social norms & technology advancements. Also good to know the blood supply is tested for HIV.