
Should the U.S. Provide $1 Billion to Replenish Israel’s ‘Iron Dome’ Missile Defense System? (H.R. 5323)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H.R. 5323?
(Updated February 25, 2022)
This bill would provide $1 billion in supplemental appropriations to provide for the procurement of interceptors for the Iron Dome missile defense system to replenish Israel’s reserve. Iron Dome is co-developed by the U.S. and Israel, and Israel had to use a significant number of interceptors to counter rockets fired by Hamas — which has been designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. — during the conflict earlier this year. The funding would remain available until the end of fiscal year 2024.
Argument in favor
Israel is a close U.S. ally and the Iron Dome missile defense system is a vital area of collaboration in that partnership because it protects Israeli civilians from rockets fired by terror groups like Hamas. More interceptors are needed for Israel’s Iron Dome defense system because of the volume of rockets fired into Israel earlier this year, so the U.S. should ensure Israel can continue to defend itself from such threats.
Argument opposed
The U.S. should not be paying for Israel to replenish its supplies of missile defense interceptors even if the Iron Dome was developed jointly by the U.S. and Israel. Blocking funding for the Iron Dome missile defense system is an opportunity to rebuke the Israeli government for perceived human rights violations or other issues, and the U.S. needs to distance itself from Israel.
Impact
The Dept. of Defense; and Israel.
Cost of H.R. 5323
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: House Appropriations Committee Chair Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) introduced this bill to provide $1 billion in emergency funding to replace Israel’s Iron Dome missile interceptors that were used to protect Israeli civilians from Hamas rockets in May:
“The United States’ commitment to the security of our friend and ally Israel is ironclad. Replenishing interceptors used to protect Israel from attacks is our legal and moral responsibility. While this funding would ordinarily be included in a year-end spending package, we are advancing this legislation now to demonstrate Congress’ bipartisan commitment to Israel’s security as part of a Middle East with lasting peace.”
Funding to replenish Israel’s Iron Dome missile defense system was initially included in House Democrats’ package that contained a continuing resolution, funding for disaster relief and Afghan evacuees, along with a debt limit increase.
The Iron Dome provision was removed following the protests of progressive Democrats according to Politico, which reported the group included lawmakers who unsuccessfully attempted to block the sale of precision-guided munitions to Israel in May. That group of House lawmakers was led by Reps. Alexandria Ocasio Cortez (D-NY), Mark Pocan (D-WI), and Rashida Tlaib (D-MI). Tlaib tweeted that she plans to oppose the standalone Iron Dome bill and added, “We must stop enabling Israel’s human rights abuses and apartheid government.”
A day after the Iron Dome provision was removed from the broader package, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-MD) announced the introduction of a standalone Iron Dome funding bill and tweeted that he “will bring this urgently needed measure to the House Floor tomorrow for a vote to ensure Israel has the ability to defend itself.” Hoyer had spoken with Israeli Foreign Affairs Minister Yair Lapid about the Iron Dome issue.
Several Democratic lawmakers who approve of U.S. support for Israel’s ability to defend itself expressed their frustration with the progressives’ effort to stop the replenishment of Iron Dome. Rep. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) sent a series of tweets about Iron Dome and the long-running U.S. role in its sustainment and observed that “to target Iron Dome now means the issue isn’t a genuine concern over the system, but rather the desire to attack something - anything - related to the State of Israel; it’s devoid of substance and irresponsible.” Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) tweeted, “A missile defense system (i.e. Iron Dome) defends civilians from missiles. Hence the name. Only in a morally inverted universe would this be considered a ‘controversy.’”
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) introduced a continuing resolution that would include Iron Dome funding, which he said “would restore the defensive assistance for our ally Israel that House Democrats stripped out to appease some of the worst elements of the far left.”
Media:
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Israel Defense Forces via Flickr / Creative Commons)The Latest
-
Changes are almost here!It's almost time for Causes bold new look—and a bigger mission. We’ve reimagined the experience to better connect people with read more...
-
The Long Arc: Taking Action in Times of Change“Change does not roll in on the wheels of inevitability, but comes through continuous struggle.” Martin Luther King Jr. Today in read more... Advocacy
-
Thousands Displaced as Climate Change Fuels Wildfire Catastrophe in Los AngelesIt's been a week of unprecedented destruction in Los Angeles. So far the Palisades, Eaton and other fires have burned 35,000 read more... Environment
-
Puberty, Privacy, and PolicyOn December 11, the Montana Supreme Court temporarily blocked SB99 , a law that sought to ban gender-affirming care for read more... Families