
Should U.S. Forces Helping the Saudi Coalition Against Iran-Backed Rebels in Yemen be Withdrawn? (H. Joint Res. 37)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is H. Joint Res. 37?
(Updated December 17, 2019)
This resolution would direct the president to remove U.S. Armed Forces from the conflict in Yemen between the Saudi-backed coalition and the Iran-backed Houthi rebels within 30 days — except for forces engaged in operations directed at Al Qaeda. U.S. troops have been assisting the coalition in an advisory and training role and providing aerial refueling assistance, which would be prohibited by this bill.
The bill uses authority granted to Congress by the War Powers Resolution, which required the president to notify Congress of military action and required the military’s withdrawal after 60 days unless Congress enacted legislation to authorize the use of military force (AUMF) or declare war.
As a joint resolution, this bill could be signed into law by the president after it’s passed by both chambers of Congress.
AMENDMENTS: The House adopted an amendment to this bill that'd express the sense of the House that it's in the U.S. national security interest to counter anti-Semitism around the world.
Argument in favor
Congress never authorized the participation of U.S. military forces in the conflict in Yemen between the Saudi coalition and the Iran-backed Houthi rebels. Those troops should be withdrawn.
Argument opposed
The U.S. has a clear national interest in helping the Saudi coalition defeat the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen. Requiring the removal of the troops providing that assistance is ill-advised.
Impact
U.S. Armed Forces in Yemen; the Saudi-led coalition; and the president.
Cost of H. Joint Res. 37
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Rep. Ro Khanna (D-CA) introduced this bill to withdraw U.S. forces helping the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen against the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen:
“The U.S.-Saudi military campaign in Yemen has triggered the world’s worst humanitarian crisis. More than 14 million Yemenis — half the country — are on the brink of famine, and at least 85,000 children have already died from hunger and disease as a result of the war. I’m proud to partner with colleagues and work to end U.S. military participation in the Saudi regime’s war in Yemen by reasserting Congress’ constitutional role on matters of war and peace. I am confident this will pass in the House when brought for a vote.”
During the 115th Congress, similar legislation passed the Senate on a 56-41 vote before stalling in the House. The White House opposed the bill, arguing that the U.S. isn’t engaged in hostilities against the Houthi rebels and that withdrawing U.S. forces would undermine national security:
“In addition to its erroneous premise, the joint resolution would harm bilateral relations in the region and negative impact the ability of the United States to prevent the spread of violent extremist organizations such as al Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula and ISIS in Yemen. The continued cooperation of the United States allows the Administration to support diplomatic negotiations to end the war, ensure humanitarian access, enhance efforts to recover United States hostages in Yemen, and defeat terrorists that seek to harm the United States.”
This legislation has the support of 78 cosponsors in the House, including 75 Democrats and three Republicans. The House Foreign Affairs Committee is set to hold a hearing regarding U.S. policy on the Arabian peninsula and in Yemen on Wednesday, February 5, 2019.
Media:
Statement of Administration Policy (Previous Version - Opposed)
Countable (Context)
Countable (Additional Context)
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: ahmedfarwan via Flickr / Creative Commons)The Latest
-
IT: What polls say about Americans' views on abortion policies, and... How do you feel about the New York gun law ruling?Welcome to Monday, June 27th, nations... What do polls say about Americans' views on abortion policies? Here's a look... Public read more...
-
The Will of the People: A Response to the Supreme CourtOn Friday, 24 hours after expanding gun rights across the United States, the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, ending 49 read more... The Constitution
-
What They’re Saying: The Supreme Court Overturns Roe v. WadeWhat’s the story? The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade case Friday morning, ending nearly half a century read more... Abortion
-
Reproductive Rights After Roe Reversal: Ways to Learn and Take ActionWhat’s the story? The U.S. Supreme Court overturned the landmark Roe v. Wade case on Friday, ending nearly 50 years of read more... States