Permanently Banning Federal Funding for Abortions (With Exceptions) (S. 109)
Do you support or oppose this bill?
What is S. 109?
(Updated November 9, 2021)
This bill would ban federal tax dollars from being spent to provide for abortions. It would make the Hyde Amendment a permanent law, and also ban federal funds from being applied to health coverage plans that include abortion services. Federal funding would be authorized to provide for abortions in cases of rape, incest, or life-threatening birth complications, but no federal tax dollars could be used for any other type of abortion.
The bill would require insurance companies to prominently disclose which healthcare plans offer abortion coverage in all marketing materials or benefit summaries. Refundable premium tax credits and cost-sharing reductions under the Affordable Care Act (aka Obamacare) wouldn’t be available for purchasing health insurance plans that cover abortions.
Additionally, the District of Columbia would be prohibited from using locally generated tax revenue to offer abortion services.
Argument in favor
Taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize abortions unless they’re occurring under dire circumstances like in cases of rape or incest, or there are life-threatening birth complications.
Argument opposed
This bill would restrict women's reproductive freedom and access to healthcare. Besides, the ban on federal abortion funding is already in place and taxpayer dollars don't go to abortions.
Impact
Women; individuals who buy health insurance or get it through their work; employers who offer healthcare plans to their workers; abortion providers; insurance companies; and the federal government.
Cost of S. 109
A CBO cost estimate is unavailable.
Additional Info
In-Depth: Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) introduced this bill to make the Hyde Amendment’s ban on the use of federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or life-threatening birth complications a permanent law. Original cosponsor Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) offered the following statement in favor on the Senate floor:
“This legislation would permanently codify the Hyde Amendment, ensuring that funding restrictions remain in place and are applied to all federal programs. Furthermore, this bill takes important steps to eliminate certain tax benefits related to abortions and improve disclosure requirements related to insurance coverage of abortion. Preventing taxpayer dollars from paying for abortion procedures - a position that a majority of Americans agree with - should not be a complicated process vulnerable to partisan attack.”
Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) called this bill an attack on women’s access to healthcare and argued that the Senate should focus on reopening the government:
“All it would take is a vote [to reopen the government] -- we know it would pass -- and we can move it through the House and send it to the President. But what have Republican leaders done instead? They have done what they’ve always done when they don’t know what else to do! They’ve scheduled a vote to attack women and their healthcare.”
In the 115th Congress, the Republican-controlled House passed a nearly identical version of this bill along party-lines in a 238-183 vote.
Of Note: Since 1976, the Hyde Amendment has banned federal funds distributed by the Dept. of Health and Human Services from being used for abortions, except in cases of rape or incest, or to save the mother from birth complications. That applies to federal dollars distributed to states under Medicaid, so the 15 state Medicaid programs that fund abortions in excess of the federal standard do so with state tax dollars (10 of which do so under a court order).
Abortion is a polarizing topic: polling from Gallup shows that 50% of Americans think abortions should be legal under certain circumstances -- meaning that they support some restrictions -- while 28% believe abortions should be legal under any circumstance, and 19% believe that abortion should be illegal in all circumstances. Further, while roughly 60% of Americans believe abortion should be legal in the first trimester, support for abortion rights in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy plummets to 28% and 13%, respectively.
Media:
-
Sponsoring Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS) Press Release
-
Cosponsoring Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA) Press Release
-
The Hill
Summary by Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: iStock.com / LPETTET)The Latest
-
Stormy Daniels Takes the Stand in Trump Hush Money TrialUpdated May 9, 2024, 5:00 p.m. EST Adult film star Stormy Daniels, also known as Stephanie Clifford, spent two days on the stand read more... Law Enforcement
-
Vermont Measure to Charge Big Oil for Climate DamagesWhat’s the story? Vermont is expected to become one of the first states to hold Big Oil accountable for the damages caused by read more... Environment
-
IT: Trump's 2016 'deny, deny, deny' campaign strategy, and... How can you help the civilians of Ukraine?Welcome to Wednesday, May 8th, weekenders... As Trump's hush money trial enters it's third week, the 2016 campaign strategy of read more...
-
How To Help Civilians in UkraineHeavy shelling and fighting have caused widespread death, destruction of homes and businesses, and severely damaged read more... Public Safety