Civic Register
| 2.25.22

President Biden Nominates Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court
Do you support the nomination of Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson to the Supreme Court?
What’s the story?
- President Joe Biden tweeted Friday morning that he will nominate Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals to the Supreme Court to replace Justice Stephen Breyer, who announced his retirement when the current term ends in June or July pending the confirmation of his successor. A formal announcement is expected later Friday, and Biden tweeted that Jackson “is one of our nation’s brightest legal minds and will be an exceptional Justice.”
- If confirmed, Jackson would be the first black woman to serve on the Supreme Court, fulfilling Biden’s campaign pledge to nominate the first black woman to the nation’s highest court. She would also be the second mother with school-age children to serve on the Supreme Court, joining Justice Amy Coney Barrett who was confirmed in 2020.
- Senate Democrats haven’t yet scheduled Jackson’s confirmation hearings in the Judiciary Committee, although party leaders have said they would like to move the process along quickly. Chairman Dick Durbin (D-IL) has previously indicated they will likely occur about three weeks after her formal nomination. That could allow for Jackson’s confirmation prior to the recess that begins on April 11th.
Who is Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson?
- Jackson, 51, is a federal judge of the District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals and has served in that role since June 2021, when she replaced Judge Merrick Garland who resigned to serve as attorney general for the Biden administration.
- The D.C. Circuit is considered the nation’s second-highest court behind the Supreme Court because its jurisdiction includes Congress and many federal agencies, which means it deals with a caseload heavy on constitutional and administrative law and tends to produce future Supreme Court justices. For instance, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh were both elevated from the D.C. Circuit.
- Prior to joining the D.C. Circuit Court, Jackson served as a federal judge of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2013.
- Perhaps the most notable case she has been involved in at the district court level was House Judiciary Committee v. McGahn, in which members of Congress sued Don McGahn, who was White House Counsel during the Trump administration, in an attempt to compel his testimony before an impeachment inquiry into obstruction of justice. Jackson rejected the administration’s argument of executive testimonial immunity and wrote a lengthy opinion that gained media attention for her statement that “presidents are not kings”. The court ruled in the House’s favor, although the ruling has been appealed by the Justice Dept.
- Jackson earned her undergraduate degree with honors from Harvard University in 1992 and her law degree with honors from Harvard Law School in 1996. She was an editor of the law review in law school.
- She served as a law clerk for three federal judges, including Judge Patti Saris in the District of Massachusetts (1996-97), Judge Bruce Selya of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (1997-98), and Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer (1999-2000).
- Jackson worked in private law practice before and after her clerkships. She then worked as a special counsel to the U.S. Sentencing Commission from 2003-05 and an assistant federal public defender in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals from 2007-10.
- She was then appointed by President Barack Obama to be vice-chair of the Sentencing Commission in 2010 and confirmed by unanimous consent, she served in the role until her appointment to the bench. During her time on the commission, it reduced the guideline sentencing range for crack cocaine offenses and reduced a two offense-level reduction for drug crimes.
- Jackson and her husband Patrick have two children age 21 and 17. Her husband is the twin brother of former House Speaker Paul Ryan’s (R-WI) brother-in-law, and Ryan introduced Jackson at her 2012 Senate confirmation hearing for her district court nomination.
How did her previous Senate confirmations go?
- When she was nominated to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in 2013, the Senate confirmed Jackson on a voice vote.
- In 2021 when Jackson was nominated to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the Senate confirmed Jackson on a 53-44 vote with all Democrats and three Republicans ― Sens. Susan Collins (R-ME), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) ― voting in favor.
- It remains to be seen how much bipartisan support her Supreme Court nomination will garner given the contentious nature of recent Supreme Court confirmations and the heightened level of vetting nominees undergo compared to district or circuit court nominations.
— Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: H2rty via Wikimedia / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
Cop28 Draft Deal Does Not Include Fossil Fuel Phase OutUpdated Dec. 11, 2023, 2:30 p.m. EST The U.N.'s draft deal from the Cop28 summit highlights various options to reduce greenhouse read more... Environment
-
BILL: Federal Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Act of 2023 (S.3205)Federal Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Act of 2023 Bill Overview Title: Federal Artificial Intelligence Risk Management read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
IT: U.S. vetoes the U.N.'s resolution for a ceasefire, and... Do you support Tuberville's block?Welcome to Monday, December 11th, friends... The U.S. vetoed a U.N. resolution demanding a humanitarian ceasefire in Gaza. The read more...
-
U.S. Vetoes U.N. Resolution Demanding Israel-Hamas CeasefireUpdated Dec. 11, 2023, 10:00 a.m. EST As global calls for another halt in the fighting grow, the U.S. vetoed a U.N. resolution read more... Israel
Strongly oppose
Activist/ terrorist need not apply
She is an activist terrorist
It is not the Color of your Skin but the Knowledge you carry underneath it to keep moving America forward to understanding and success.
Excellent to finally have another supremely qualified candidate! Bringing a background and skill set that doesn’t currently exist on the court but reflects the United States.
She's a liberal judge!
I am hoping that she can explain the rules to the others so they can begin to represent the 70% of the American people in their rulings as they are supposed to. She might also mention to them that Row v Wade is settled (established) law. The subject does not need to be revisited again. Move forward, move forward.
If she meets the qualifications give her the job.
It is ironic how some people have fears about the nomination of a black woman to the SCOTUS regarding either her qualifications or that she might be prone to rule based more based on party affiliation rather than the constitution. All I can say is: “ Oh the hypocrisy”! As long as the SCOTUS was being stacked in the right’s favor along with the fact that they “Looked Right”, there was no such concern. It is today’s Republican Party that is more concerned with fidelity to the party more than the constitution or the actual rule of law.
Is she qualified?
Great pick, the best I’ve seen in my adult life.
Absolutely support. First and foremost she is eminently qualified and why not an African American woman?
What I have read is that this judge does not recognize the Bill of Rights as intended when ratified and thinks that she should take skin color and social standing into consideration in her decisions. We need Justices on the Supreme Court who adhere to the Constitution as intended by our founders and hold all equal under the law.
Glad this campaign promise was kept.
I support any nominee who hasn't already made up their mind about what result they want and will ignore precedent to do so, like the howler monkey contingent that has taken over SCOTUS does regularly. Several rulings of late have shown how they're just making s*** up to justify the indefensible.
She's more than qualified.
I’m praying Congress will put partisan politics aside, act like adults and swiftly confirm Judge Brown-Jackson! This country has been negligent in creating a Supreme Court that reflects the diverse makeup of our population. It must do it now!
I’m somewhat concerned that she will turn out to be a political activist in support of the Democrat agenda, but I’m willing to be convinced that she’ll recognize the Constitution as the law of the land.
From what I've been able to discover about this particular person, she will be an asset to the SCOTUS. Diversity is a must to maintain balance in decisions regarding the U.S, Constitution. To hell with what the Gods of Privilege want. Open minded, new blood is needed in the halls of the Supreme Court. No religious fanatics, no sexual abusers, and no outdated idealism accepted.
she is very qualified to service in the supreme court as the first black female we need more females in the supreme court there too many right wing old white men