Civic Register
| 1.13.22

Supreme Court Rejects Biden Admin's Private Sector Vaccine Mandate, Upholds Requirement for Healthcare Workers
How do you feel about the rulings?
What’s the story?
- The Supreme Court on Thursday issued a pair of rulings in cases related to the Biden administration’s vaccine mandates, striking down a vaccine-or-test requirement for private sector employers with at least 100 workers, and upholding a mandate for healthcare workers at facilities participating in Medicare and Medicaid unless granted a religious or health exemption.
- Justices split 6-3 along ideological lines in the private sector mandate case, with the Court’s conservatives holding that the Biden administration and the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) overstepped their legal authority by issuing an emergency temporary standard (ETS) requiring private employers with at least 100 employees to either show proof of vaccination or show a negative once a week and wear a mask on the job. The Court’s three liberal justices dissented. The unsigned majority opinion read in part:
“Contrary to the dissent’s contention, imposing a vaccine mandate on 84 million Americans in response to a worldwide pandemic is simply not “part of what the agency was built for.” That is not to say OSHA lacks authority to regulate occupation-specific risks related to COVID-19. Where the virus poses a special danger because of the particular features of an employee’s job or workplace, targeted regulations are plainly permissible. We do not doubt, for example, that OSHA could regulate researchers who work with the COVID-19 virus. So too could OSHA regulate risks associated with working in particularly crowded or cramped environments. But the danger present in such workplaces differs in both degree and kind from the everyday risk of contracting COVID-19 that all face. OSHA’s indiscriminate approach fails to account for this crucial distinction ― between occupational risk and risk more generally ― and accordingly the mandate takes on the character of a general health measure, rather than an “occupational safety or health standard.” …
We are told by the States and the employers that OSHA’s mandate will force them to incur billions of dollars in unrecoverable compliance costs and will cause hundreds of thousands of employees to leave their jobs. For its part, the Federal Government says that the mandate will save over 6,500 lives and prevent hundreds of thousands of hospitalizations. It is not our role to weigh such tradeoffs. In our system of government, that is the responsibility of those chosen by the people through democratic processes. Although Congress has indisputably given OSHA the power to regulate occupational dangers, it has not given that agency the power to regulate public health more broadly. Requiring the vaccination of 84 million Americans, selected simply because they work for employers with more than 100 employees, certainly falls in the latter category.”
- The three liberal justices’ dissenting opinion read in part:
"So the administrative agency charged with ensuring health and safety in workplaces did what Congress commanded it to: It took action to address COVID–19’s continuing threat in those spaces. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) issued an emergency temporary standard (Standard), requiring either vaccination or masking and testing, to protect American workers. The Standard falls within the core of the agency’s mission: to “protect employees” from “grave danger” that comes from “new hazards” or exposure to harmful agents. OSHA estimates—and there is no ground for disputing—that the Standard will save over 6,500 lives and prevent over 250,000 hospitalizations in six months’ time.
Yet today the Court issues a stay that prevents the Standard from taking effect. In our view, the Court’s order seriously misapplies the applicable legal standards. And in so doing, it stymies the Federal Government’s ability to counter the unparalleled threat that COVID–19 poses to our Nation’s workers. Acting outside of its competence and without legal basis, the Court displaces the judgments of the Government officials given the responsibility to respond to workplace health emergencies. We respectfully dissent.”
- In the case involving the mandate for healthcare workers at Medicare and Medicaid facilities, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the Court’s three liberal justices in upholding the rule. The unsigned majority opinion read in part:
“Congress has authorized the Secretary to impose conditions on the receipt of Medicaid and Medicare funds that “the Secretary finds necessary in the interest of the health and safety of individuals who are furnished services.” COVID–19 is a highly contagious, dangerous, and—especially for Medicare and Medicaid patients—deadly disease. The Secretary of Health and Human Services determined that a COVID–19 vaccine mandate will substantially reduce the likelihood that healthcare workers will contract the virus and transmit it to their patients. He accordingly concluded that a vaccine mandate is “necessary to promote and protect patient health and safety” in the face of the ongoing pandemic.
The rule thus fits neatly within the language of the statute. After all, ensuring that providers take steps to avoid transmitting a dangerous virus to their patients is consistent with the fundamental principle of the medical profession: first, do no harm. It would be the “very opposite of efficient and effective administration for a facility that is supposed to make people well to make them sick with COVID–19.”
- The dissenting opinion for four conservative justices authored by Justice Clarence Thomas read in part:
“Finally, our precedents confirm that the Government has failed to make a strong showing on the merits. “We expect Congress to speak clearly when authorizing an agency to exercise powers of vast economic and political significance.” And we expect Congress to use “exceedingly clear language if it wishes to significantly alter the balance between state and federal power.” The omnibus rule is undoubtedly significant—it requires millions of healthcare workers to choose between losing their livelihoods and acquiescing to a vaccine they have rejected for months. Vaccine mandates also fall squarely within a State’s police power, and, until now, only rarely have been a tool of the Federal Government. If Congress had wanted to grant CMS authority to impose a nationwide vaccine mandate, and consequently alter the state-federal balance, it would have said so clearly. It did not.
These cases are not about the efficacy or importance of COVID–19 vaccines. They are only about whether CMS has the statutory authority to force healthcare workers, by coercing their employers, to undergo a medical procedure they do not want and cannot undo. Because the Government has not made a strong showing that Congress gave CMS that broad authority, I would deny the stays pending appeal. I respectfully dissent."
RELATED READING
- Supreme Court Hears Arguments Over Biden’s Vaccine Mandates (1/8/21)
- Supreme Court to Hear Arguments Over Biden’s Vaccine Mandates (12/23/21)
— Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Stock.com / Inside Creative House)
The Latest
-
BILL: Federal Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Act of 2023 (S.3205)Federal Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Act of 2023 Bill Overview Title: Federal Artificial Intelligence Risk Management read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
IT: Conditions worsen for civilians in Gaza, and... Do you support safe injecting sites?Welcome to Friday, December 8th, nations... Conditions are worsening for civilians in Gaza, graphic videos show. A video emerged read more...
-
The Latest: Conditions Worsen for Civilians, Graphic Video ShowsUpdated Dec. 8, 2023, 9:30 a.m. EST A video emerged on social media yesterday showing dozens of Palestinian men detained by the read more... Israel
-
New Research Finds Safe Injection Sites Not Linked to CrimeWhat's the story? Recent research contradicts claims that safe injection sites contribute to increased crime or public drug use. read more... Law Enforcement
Idiocy! And now, Governors are wanting to lift mandates as well because "Omicron is waning". They neglect to ask themselves "WHY is it waning?" Maybe because we have defensive mechanisms in place, like masking and social distancing? This is the very same idiotic "rationale" they use with Speed Limits. They lower the Speed limits because the accident rates are high and then, when the accident rates get lower they raise them again and we repeat the whole process all over again. AND just what is their criteria for "waning"? On the average, we now have 2,400+ people dying PER DAY in our country. Apparently their definition of "waning" and mine are not at all similar.
Every kid enrolled in school has to produce an immunization record covering a whole range of vaccines compulsorily administered. Without this no admission granted 10 billion covid19 vaccines have been administered around the world so far And scotus decides vaccine mandates encroach on our freedoms?
Justice Neil Gorsuch, Clarence Thomas and Samurai Alito are on the wrong side of history on the Covid-19 mandate in the time of emergencies, like in 1905. Congress routinely empowers agencies to oversee health and safety, besides the President. I guess going to war we have to wait for congress to come back in session and then decided. Might as well get rid of the EPA, FCC, OSHA, FBI, CIA, post office and others!
you can find the stats from CDC(believe this is in Canada) that list vaccinated vs. un-vaccinated deaths - nearly no difference.
Ruh roh Rhaggy. The number of people who support mandatory vaccinations is getting smaller every day. Better invent something else to worry about so you can continue to group think.
Well, if the idea was to stop the spread. You missed it.
Those that voted against the mandate are now effectively spreading the virus. They should at the very least feel shame! What do you do with people like that? Give them a vacation.
It’s for the safety of the public. Just as the small pox and the polio vaccine was. So many illnesses are now controlled due to vaccination!
Our Supreme Court has upheld Informed Consent and thankfully so but also our laws that have incorporated the Nuremberg Codes, International designed after WWII to prevent those horrific violation that occurred to a segment of a population deemed by a few to be surplus people.
The unvaccinated should be forced to stay away from those of us who were smart enough to get vaccinated. They should not be allowed near any children.
Another failure of nine people who rule the public by political decisions to make policy. In this case In this case support for a national health policy that has been weaponized. They make a mockery of justice.
I look with askance at Supreme Court Justices. Lives matter? Banning abortion for ALL women seems to indicate that. Then not mandating vaccination for ALL people could cost lives. Conflict right there. I am losing respect for the much-vaunted Supreme Court Justices. They're no longer consistent.
Why ask how I feel about this decision. The correct question is what do I think? I believe that the court made the correct decision against an illegal and arbitrary rule with the force of law with penalties. I believe that Congress is the only Constitutional authority to make law, not agencies or the Executive Branch. It is time that Congress took back its responsibilities and stop farming out its governing responsibilities to unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats.
Disgusting! The court has voted against women's rights, Voters' rights, and now against saving people's lives from a pandemic. What next?
Ok folks as promised here is the last day of my full year of Coronavirus figures since January 20th at noontime to present 365 days. They are with 3 vaccines since day 1. Cases 42,987,522 new cases yesterday 1,178,403. Deaths 578,979 new deaths yesterday 2,990. President Trump figures can now be compared each with one full year. President Trump had no vaccines until the last 38 days. Cases 24,717808 Deaths 274,761. Comrade dear leader Beijing Biden promised he was not going to shut out economy down but would shut the virus down in one year plus he would cure cancer in the first year. Comrade your time is up. You nearly doubled the cases by just shy of 300,000 cases and nearly double the deaths just shy of 14,000. Yet you leave our borders wide open with no vaccines or quarantine or testing. He has caught and released in his first year over 2 million illegal aliens in just 365 days.
Stuck in this with a bunch of idiots going round and round -
Throw in Justice Thomas, too. It’s too bad the Me Too movement was not around when he was nominated. Now there’s a man who should NEVER have been selected either!
Glad the Supreme Court acknowledged that private businesses could choose freedom for their workers. Very unhappy that those who were hailed as heroes working during the pandemic WITHOUT a vaccine, our medical personnel, are still required to get vaccines. They kept themselves and their patients safe but are no longer trusted to keep doing exactly that.
I want this pandemic over, and it won't end or even stop mutating until everyone is vaxed.
Without people being mandated to get vaccinated many won't and we will have more variants arise and we will have more people die. Also, the economy will never fully recover