Civic Register
| 8.8.21
Senate Considers Amendments to Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill
How do you feel about the Senate’s amendment votes to the bipartisan infrastructure package?
What’s the story?
- The Senate is debating amendments to the bipartisan infrastructure package, known as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act. The first amendments were considered Monday and more will receive votes in the days ahead.
- Here’s a rundown of the amendments the Senate has voted on so far or scheduled for a future vote:
Sunday, August 8th
- No amendment votes occurred.
Saturday, August 7th
- No amendment votes occurred.
Friday, August 6th
- No floor votes are scheduled as senators attend the funeral of the late Sen. Mike Enzi (R-WY).
Thursday, August 5th
- No amendment votes were held.
Wednesday, August 4th
- Schumer Amendment (#2570) - Offered by Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), this amendment would establish safety standards for certain limousines. Adopted 58-39.
- Fischer Amendment (#2164) - Offered by Sen. Deb Fischer (R-NE), this amendment would require the establishment of an online interactive map displaying the locations of federally-funded broadband deployment projects to promote transparency. Adopted 95-0.
- Bennet Amendment (#2548) - Offered by Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO), this amendment would require the Dept. of Agriculture to establish a Joint Chiefs Landscape Restoration Partnership program. Adopted by voice vote.
- Carper Amendment (#2564) - Offered by Sen. Tom Carper (D-DE), this amendment would improve provisions in the bill providing funding for the Army Corps of Engineers. Adopted by voice vote.
- Rosen Amendment (#2358) - Offered by Sen. Jacky Rosen (D-NV), this amendment would modify a provision providing support for activities to increase the resiliency of the National Highway System to mitigate damages from wildfires. Adopted by voice vote.
- Lee Amendment (#2279) - Offered by Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), this amendment would establish a project delivery program and reform environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act. Not adopted 47-50.
- Scott (FL) Amendment (#2338) - Offered by Sen. Rick Scott (R-FL), this amendment would prohibit funds from being disbursed or obligated if the Congressional Budget Office determines that it could result in an increase in inflation. Not adopted 52-45.
- Daines Amendment (#2449) - Offered by Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT), this amendment would provide $300 million for post-fire forest restoration activities over the next five years. Not adopted 48-50.
- Cardin-Wicker Amendment (#2478) - Offered by Sens. Ben Cardin (D-MD), this amendment would require the Minority Business Development Agency of the Dept. of Commerce to promote and administer programs in the public and private sectors to assist the development of minority business enterprises. Adopted by voice vote.
- Lankford Amendment (#2233) - Offered by Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), this amendment would require that federal aid, grants, subgrants, contracts, and subcontracts authorized by this bill only be awarded to entities that enroll in and comply with the E-Verify Program (which checks the citizenship and immigration status of workers). Not adopted 53-45.
- Peters-Rounds Amendment (#2464) - Offered by Sens. Gary Peters (D-MI) and Mike Rounds (R-SD), this amendment would modify cybersecurity provisions of the underlying bill. Adopted 96-2.
- Kennedy Amendment (#2210) - Offered by Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), this amendment would provide emergency assistance for disaster response and recovery for expenses related to Hurricanes Laura, Delta, and Zeto. Not adopted 19-79.
- Wicker Amendment (#2146) - Offered by Sen. Roger Wicker (R-MS), this amendment would apply the Administrative Procedures Act to the Broadband, Equity, Access, and Deployment Program. Not adopted 43-55.
- Johnson Amendment (#2245) - Offered by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI), this amendment would prohibit the secretary of homeland security and other federal officials from canceling, invalidating, or breaching any contract for the construction or improvement of any physical barrier along the U.S. border, or for other border security measures. Not adopted 48-49.
Tuesday, August 3rd
- Van Hollen Amendment (#2354) - Offered by Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-MD), this amendment would include payment and performance security requirements for infrastructure financing under this bill. Adopted 97-0.
- Cruz-Warnock Amendment (#2300) - Offered by Sens. Ted Cruz (R-TX) and Raphael Warnock (D-GA), this amendment would designate additional high priority corridors within the National Highway system, including specified roadways in Texas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, North Carolina, and South Carolina. Adopted by voice vote.
- Duckworth Amendment (#2140) Offered by Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-IL), this amendment would require entities receiving grants under this bill to commit to pursuing public transportation accessibility projects. Not adopted 48-50.
- Lee Amendment (#2255) - Offered by Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), this amendment would replace the text of this bill with Lee’s legislation to reduce the federal gas tax by over 11 cents per gallon; reform the National Highway Trust Fund; streamline National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requirements; and remove Davis-Bacon prevailing wage rules. Not adopted 20-78.
- Lummis-Kelly Amendment (#2181) - Offered by Sens. Cynthia Lummis (R-WY) and Mark Kelly (D-AZ), this amendment would require the Dept. of Transportation to study the direct costs of highway use by various types of users within four years. Specifically, it would consider the federal costs in design, construction, rehabilitation, and maintenance of federal-aid highways based on the use of vehicles of different dimensions, weights, axles, and other specifications; their frequency in the traffic stream; the safety, emissions, congestion, and noise-related costs created by them; and the proportionate share of costs attributable to each class of highway users. Adopted 95-3.
Monday, August 2nd
- Barrasso Amendment (#2180) - Offered by Sen. John Barrasso (R-WY), this amendment would limit funds under this bill from being used to encourage or facilitate building codes that restrict or prohibit the use of natural gas in residential and commercial buildings for space heating, water heating, cooking, or other purposes; or that would compel the adoption of model building codes. Not adopted 45-48.
- Thune-Tester Amendment (#2162) - Offered by Sens. John Thune (R-SD) and Jon Tester (D-MT), this amendment would identify ways in which the number of workers enrolled in 5G training programs can be expanded to grow the telecommunications workforce. Adopted 95-1.
- Padilla-Moran Amendment (#2133) - Offered by Sens. Alex Padilla (D-CA) and Jerry Moran (R-KS), this amendment would make it easier for funding under this bill to be used to improve healthcare facilities for Indian tribes by striking requirements that renovations meet now-obsolete accreditation standards and only use the funding they already receive. Adopted 90-7.
— Eric Revell
(Photo Credit: Capitol: ttarasiuk via Flickr / Creative Commons)
The Latest
-
IT: Battles between students and police intensify, and... 💻 Should we regulate AI access to our private data?Welcome to Thursday, May 2nd, listeners... The battle between protesters and police intensifies on college campuses across the read more...
-
Should U.S. Implement Laws Protecting Private Data from AI Access?Artificial intelligence is rapidly integrating into our everyday lives, transforming the way we work, live, and interact with read more... Artificial Intelligence
-
Protests Grow Nationwide as Students Demand Divestment From IsraelUpdated May 1, 2024, 11:00 a.m. EST The battle between protesters and police has intensified on college campuses across the read more... Advocacy
-
IT: Rumors spread about ICC charging Israel with war crimes, and... Should states disqualify Trump?Welcome to Tuesday, April 30th, friends... Rumors spread that the International Criminal Court could issue arrest warrants for read more...
Interesting to read how many comments focus on the government giving the people something. Congratulations, you are officially a socialist, possibly a communist. It feels good for now getting all the freebies while you sit on your ass but you should investigate the history of this societal direction. Ultimately, you will end up with less, only the bare essentials and that's a maybe, as the ruling class takes everything else from you. So sad the indoctrination of so many of you by the flawed public school system that failed to teach civics and other basics, instead focusing on social issues while growing their pension plans. Sick.
It looks pretty good until you read all the pollutions stuff added on to it. Must be they don't figure this earth is going to last another 10 years with what the republicans want added to it. I thought part of the purpose of this was to cut down on our destruction of the Earth. Employ new all clean energy types of building materials heating/cooling systems etc. You better go over those added recommendations with a fine toothed comb.
Kind of a dumb question isn't it? It is their job to formulate legislation and the amendment process is part of that. Duh. I just hope they are able to cut out as much of the crud in there as possible. The last thing we need right now is more stimulus. REAL infrastructure we need although it could be argued this is a bad time given the speeding economy and burgeoning debt.
This is how the legislative process is supposed to work!
I think that they need to hurry and I've read that the Republican wing doesn't feel like hurrying.
Stop trying to negotiate with terrorists. Just get passed what we need to pass and keep moving. The gop is not exactly subtle. They want power at all costs. Making joe look like a failure is their primary goal. They don’t care how many people die. The more, the merrier for them. They desperately want more people to die under this administration than under Dolt 45. Fox won’t let you in their building if you haven’t been vaccinated, but they don’t want YOU to get vaccinated. All the republicans pushing back against common sense? All vaccinated. I kept wondering why they were trying to kill their own voters? Then I saw the light. They don’t matter. No one matters. That’s why they are trying to pass the anti voter laws they are pushing. Voters won’t matter. They don’t want anyone to vote. They just want to take over. It terrifies me that my children are having children. They have no future. None of us do. Not even them. Because they are so busy trying to destroy us, that they will destroy themselves in the process. Too power hungry to live in any sort or reality at all. The only actual silver lining, is that they will destroy themselves. Forgive me, I’m looking at my beautiful grandson and I’m hostile as hell.
You have lost Your collective minds. We backed You after You allowed Obamacare to pass, and then on Your failed provinces to repeal (you cannot replace a socialist plan that with another socialist plan) it. Stop the communist takeover of Our Exceptional Nation now. If You can't act decisively prior to the next election voting for You will be useless.
Not as big as I wanted but this is a big step. With this divided Congress a very big step.
The bipartisan bill has expanded past the good idea category into boondoggle category. Trim it back by $300,000,000. Remove the California Standards measures, eliminate any Federal role for community water standards. Go back to Roads, Bridges, Airports, and ports Do not pass the bill in current form.
The dems will screw the republicans and see that none of their amendments get passed.
Congress needs to reject this infrastructure bill because it’s full of pork and Marxist policies. Vote no on this horrific bill!
Cryptocurrency tokens are not securities. Failing to exempt key components of the blockchain infrastructure would be a punishment to innovation. Carve out necessary exemptions for stateside miners, software developers and DeFi exchanges, unless you are in bed with the banks and don't want crypto to succeed. Furthermore, the Barrasso amendment should pass #2180. There is no reason for infrastructure funds to be used to restrict the use of Natural Gas, its our abundant transitional fuel which paves our way into renewables, unless you're in bed with Big Coal.
As a Pennsylvania's resident and retiree living primarily on Social Security, my small IRA investment in stablecoin,interest bearing accounts at Gemini Trust and Blockfi are providing an meaningful $200/mo supplementation. Please don't pass onerous taxation on the crypto industry that will affect my wife and I. From what I read the Wyden-Lummis-Toomey amendment looks the most fair.
This is another “We need to pass it to see what’s in it” bill that the democrats are putting forward. I strongly hope that the conservatives in the senate stand with each other to defeat this bill. How much if the oil reserve does the bill suggest to sell in order to pay for the bill? How much of a tax increase is in the bill? How much more inflation will we be able to absorb? Are there “Shovel ready jobs” in this bill? Get it together, we can’t afford any more government spending!
They have way too much junk involved in this bill. I doubt that will influence anyone who is a Democrat. But I’m not a Democrat or Republican. I am an independent. And I think independently not on a party line. It’s way too Much money. This administration is spending money like he’s pouring water into a glass. In a structure does need to be done. And that’s all the bills should be for infrastructure and nothing more. Stop eating the junk.
Not to happy about the Republicans supporting this bill whatsoever! I know one thing next time #US, Conservative’ have all three (3) branches of our GOVT, we better start to advance our Policies or we’re going to be in serious trouble!#MAGA,#DT,#ImpeachJoeBidenChinaCCPCrimes,#CE
It needs more environmental protections.
kmK says it all. We know this ‘amendment’ process is what it is: delaying tactics for most part used that way by ‘Republicans’-(if they exist).
What I am most concerned with is the never ending rope-a-dope tactics of the Republican Faction to propose endless amendments and debate for a bill which they ultimately will never pass. They, of course, will blame their sworn enemy, the Democratic Party for only agreeing to useful amendments. This has happened over and over again with the Republican Senate. Why would anyone expect anything different this time? It is all political theater designed to stop the Democratic Party from accomplishing their legislative agenda despite overwhelming support from their Republican non-radicalized constituents. They would rather not support what their constituents desire in an effort to discredit their opponents. Hell, until very recently, very few endorsed getting people vaccinated because they would rather sacrifice their own constituents in order to denigrate their political opponents. … … … Schumer needs to put a cap on the debate and actually force the Republican Faction to show their hand. This looks a lot like the almost two years wasted negotiating with Republican Senators for the affordable care act before a senior Republican, Grassley admitted that the Republican Faction would never vote for the Affordable Care Act, no matter how many concessions that Obama made. Also, a lot like the bipartisan commission proposed to address the Jan 6th insurrection that met each and every criteria demanded by Republican ‘leadership’ - only for the Republican Senate Faction vote to filibuster even debating it. Why does anyone expect anything different this time? … … … Finally, if the framer’s felt that any supermajority should be required to pass most legislation in the Senate instead of a democratic majority, why did they not make provisions for it in the Constitution as they did for certain very specific critical Senate votes? They made no specific provisions that allowed the filibuster to be used by a minority to overrule the will of the majority for general legislative actions. So, why would ‘originalists’ even tolerate the general use of the filibuster which runs counter to the farmer’s view of how a democratic republic should function? Isn’t the filibuster by it’s very nature, unconstitutional? … … … We do know that the framer’s were extremely concerned about political parties potential to become political factions, that would put their party’s well being above the well being of their country. Their fear has been realized by the Republican Faction’s abandonment of the rules and accepted norms which is the glue that holds the institutions of our democracy together; as well as their weaponizing of the constitutional protections afforded to the minority as a tool to overrule the will of the democratic majority. Our country will remain in perpetual gridlock as long as the one-and-done filibuster is permitted to be used as a tool to prevent progress. … … … This is the principal reason why our country continues to fall behind in almost all international metrics of the health and welfare of our youth, our people and the quality of our governance. We will continue this slide until the filibuster is eliminated or neutered and we stop worshipping the gods of trickle down economics - a gospel which has never worked but is still continually being spouted by the loudest big-money-funded megaphones from there pulpits.
No No No! Against this Bill. Start over too much Pork! Infraestructura like roads, bridges, road Stops rest areas, internet, Parks & Recreation Areas, Airports, etc. but NOT PORK ITEMS LIKE MUSEUMS and non essential Non department of transportation streets, roads, buddy business needs. Then budget is low for each year for each project. Must have background investigation for each one and must have complete date done ✅. No Pork No Business Buddies involvement. Budget each year. Oversight committee is volunteering person in Congress each committee is 50/50 no picking people no favorite buddy NO TERMS OVER 100 pages simple words and communication is updated every Month-Accountability on Spending Tools must be discounted and materials be MADE IN AMERICA BY AMERICANS VERIFIED.