What Schmucks! Santa Cruz Organic Might Contain GMOs?

To: Smucker's, R.W. Knudsen and Santa Cruz Organics

Until Smucker's and its organic brands, R.W. Knudsen and Santa Cruz Organics, support state GMO labeling campaigns and discontinue all financial support for anti-labeling efforts, you will not receive a dime from my family.

Shame on Smucker's for claiming to be a family-oriented company, while...

Until Smucker's and its organic brands, R.W. Knudsen and Santa Cruz Organics, support state GMO labeling campaigns and discontinue all financial support for anti-labeling efforts, you will not receive a dime from my family.

Shame on Smucker's for claiming to be a family-oriented company, while simultaneously spending over a half million dollars to prevent California consumers from knowing whether their foods have been altered in a laboratory with foreign viruses and bacteria.

And shame on Santa Cruz Organics for parroting discredited lies that genetically engineered foods are both safe and are no different than real food. If this were true, why would companies like Monsanto and Dupont need to own patents on these organisms?

There is a growing body of scientific evidence suggesting there are numerous health and environmental concerns related to GMOs. That’s why 61 other countries already require such basic labeling – just as we have for 3000 other ingredients here in America. Why not for GMOs too?

Smucker's and its organic subsidiaries should join the effort to label GMOs and offer consumers healthier, natural and organic alternatives. Until that time comes, I refuse to purchase any product made by, or owned by, Smucker's.

10,000

5,469 people signed the petition

That Santa Cruz Organic© applesauce and peanut butter you're feeding your kids? Although by law, they can't contain genetically engineered ingredients, they might contain genetically modified organisms (GMOs), according to a Santa Cruz customer service representative. The profoundly misinformed rep also wrongly told us that "the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, the U.S. Department of Agriculture, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have determined that existing biotech foods are safe and do not differ in any meaningful way from other food." Really? And how did these agencies "determine" all this? By asking Monsanto, and then taking the biotech bully's word for it.  

Santa Cruz Organic and R.W. Knudsen are both owned by the J.M. Smucker Co., which contributed $555,000 to the $46-million war chest that helped narrowly defeat California's Prop 37. Prop 37 was citizens' initiative that would have required mandatory labeling of foods containing GMOs.

Please sign the letter below. Tell executives at Smucker's that you won't buy their products – or the products of their organic subsidiaries - until they support state GMO labeling campaigns and discontinue all financial support for anti-labeling efforts.

Smucker's, maker of products that are part of a staple diet for millions of American children, has successfully branded itself as a company that provides tasty, wholesome food for kids. In reality, the company sells a myriad of unhealthy products chock full of GMOs - including High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS), a big contributor to America's growing obesity problem.

Conflicts of Interest, Selling Out Children's Health, and Denying Consumer Choice


Smucker's serves on the Board of the Grocery Manufacturers Association (GMA), an organization on record claiming HFCS, full of GMO corn, is "natural." The GMA spent $2 million to defeat Prop 37 which it claimed was its "single highest priority" for the year.

The GMA's membership reads like a virtual who's who of anti-worker, anti-health and anti-family farmer interests. Members include outsourcing trendsetter Bain and Company, notorious polluter Dow Chemical, anti-union heavyweights Safeway Inc. and Bayer, and Monsanto, the world's largest pesticide corporation.

Julia Sabin, Vice President, Industry and Government Affairs at Smucker's, just recently served as the President of the Board of the Organic Trade Association (OTA). The OTA sells itself as a friend to the organic movement when in fact it's a trade association which represents large multinational companies that sell "natural" and conventional products made with GMO ingredients.

Companies like Smucker's oppose labeling because they've built a business model that relies on a lack of food system transparency. Labeling GMOs threatens their stranglehold on consumer choice, and prevents small farmers, the organics industry, and truly natural food producers from competing on an equal playing field.

Please the petition. Tell executives at Smucker's that you won't buy their products – or the products of their organic subsidiaries - until they support state GMO labeling campaigns and discontinue all financial support for anti-labeling efforts.

Recent Signatures

  1. 5,469
    Mary Coady Easton, MD
    3 hrs ago
  2. 5,468
    Sandra Dominguez Bakersfield, CA
    1 day ago
  3. 5,467
    Becky Mundy Harrisburg, PA
    4 days ago
  4. 5,466
    Marie Page Canada
    5 days ago
  5. 5,465
    David Romportl Minneapolis, MN
    5 days ago
  6. 5,464
    Angela Hammontree Seattle, WA
    6 days ago

Discuss the petition

26 comments have been posted

Invite friends to sign the petition

Thanks for signing the petition!

Spread the word by inviting friends

Please choose at least one friend.
You must give Causes permission to post on your behalf to share on your timeline.
You must give Causes permission to your friends' locations to find them.
Your message is too long.

Selected friends ()

Personal message

Share

0 of 1 batches sent

Check the "Don't ask again" box below and you won't have to confirm the next time you send invitations

Remind your friends to sign this petition