Thanks for taking the poll
Can you help us reach our goal of 15,000 votes?
Does America need tougher gun laws?
- Posted to Civic Engagement: Make Our Voices … by Jade Kachina
13,496 people voted
This Monday a gunman shot and killed a police officer and a civilian, while wounding several others, within two streets of Texas A&M University. The tragedy came in the wake of two other shootings that occurred less than three weeks apart - one at a movie theatre in Colorado and another at a Sikh Temple in Wisconsin. As the country grieves the tragic loss of innocent civilian lives, these mass shootings have reignited the national debate on gun laws.
Many gun control advocates are calling on the Federal Government to renew the 1994 Federal Assault Weapons Ban (FAWB) - a law prohibiting the civilian use of assault weapons (like the AR-15 semi-automatic assault rifle that James Holmes used in the Aurora massacre.) While President Obama backed the ban during his 2008 candidacy, he has neglected to take action on curbing gun violence during his last four years in office. Meanwhile, Mitt Romney signed a statewide assault weapons ban when he served as Massachusetts Governor, yet the Presidential hopeful now says he opposes any new restrictions.
With the safety of the American people at stake - should our elected officials bring back the expired FAWB? Where do you stand on the issue?
-
Update #2
Posted by Jade Kachina (Campaign Leader) on Aug 24, 2012Just this morning, yet another tragic shooting propelled the issue of U.S. gun legislation to the forefront of the national dialogue; a gunman, who police identified as 58-year-old Jeffrey Johnson, opened fire on his former manager outside the Empire State building. The disgruntled employee used his .45 magnum to kill his victim, seriously injure four bystanders, and send at least five people to the hospital with minor wounds, before authorities shot and killed him.
The majority of the...
… -
Update #1
Posted by Jade Kachina (Campaign Leader) on Aug 15, 2012Yet another tragic shooting occurred this morning in the nation's capital. At 10:45am a gunman walked into the lobby of the Family Research Council - a conservative organization that deals in issues of faith, family and freedom - and opened fire on a security guard. Luckily, the guard only sustained a wound to the arm and was able to wrestle the shooter to the ground and disarm him before police arrived at the scene. Now held in FBI custody, the shooter has yet to be identified and...
…
0 of 1 batches sent
Check the "Don't ask again" box below and you won't have to confirm the next time you send invitations
Discuss the poll
The example, or update, you just gave is just another prime reason there should be less gun control and more freedom to keep and bare arms for descent citizens. If your logic cannot out-way your emotions, then nothing I can say will convince you. The sooner you relieve yourself of your progressive mentality the sooner common sense will make itself available to you. Criminals, emotional or mentally unstable, terrorists and other like minded individuals do "not" worry about gun laws. They...
…The example, or update, you just gave is just another prime reason there should be less gun control and more freedom to keep and bare arms for descent citizens. If your logic cannot out-way your emotions, then nothing I can say will convince you. The sooner you relieve yourself of your progressive mentality the sooner common sense will make itself available to you. Criminals, emotional or mentally unstable, terrorists and other like minded individuals do "not" worry about gun laws. They will get and use them no matter what the law says. If I'm not mistaken, the Empire State Building is still in New York City. New York City has some of the most stringent gun laws in the country. The laws didn't stop this guy, did they? "NO", they only stopped the descent people from defending themselves and he was able to shoot more than "one" person. This is the consequence of your gun laws. More descent people get hurt or killed. If you are too dumb to see this, if you aren't smart enough to realize this, then you are not smart enough to converse with me. When you grow up and hopefully grow out of your progressive mentality. Come back and talk to me then. Until then, Don't assault me with any more of your ignorant propaganda. Everybody I know would tell you the same.
Harry, you are absolutely right!! Nothing more to say!
Greg Hayes & Jason Hale, just to name a couple at the top of the list, are right on. These anti-gun, more gov regulation promoters don't have a clue. It is unfortunate that these intelligent, good intention people can't seem to understand that a gov reg, ban or law has no effect on a criminal or a mentally imbalanced person. After banning guns so that law abiding people cannot protect them themselves, their family, from those who have no respect for the law - what next? Knives, axes,...
…Greg Hayes & Jason Hale, just to name a couple at the top of the list, are right on. These anti-gun, more gov regulation promoters don't have a clue. It is unfortunate that these intelligent, good intention people can't seem to understand that a gov reg, ban or law has no effect on a criminal or a mentally imbalanced person. After banning guns so that law abiding people cannot protect them themselves, their family, from those who have no respect for the law - what next? Knives, axes, hammers, how about cars? Has anyone totaled up the number of people killed by a mentally deranged person behind the wheel?
Great point Jerry.
right now I am pain free my swollen foot don't hurt , and have been couped up in my house, so I'll get in my car that CAN'T run until the key goes in the ignitiom and take off, same principal as the gun and to make the point clearer I'll paint a HUGE PISTOL on the side from front to rear.. Now here I go down the road bam oh crap just wiped out 4 people man will the public be pissed, wait no they won't they will only see an auto not the pistol painted on the side, I'll get hauled to jail but...
…right now I am pain free my swollen foot don't hurt , and have been couped up in my house, so I'll get in my car that CAN'T run until the key goes in the ignitiom and take off, same principal as the gun and to make the point clearer I'll paint a HUGE PISTOL on the side from front to rear.. Now here I go down the road bam oh crap just wiped out 4 people man will the public be pissed, wait no they won't they will only see an auto not the pistol painted on the side, I'll get hauled to jail but wait what did the killing he was in a car but yeah did you see the sze of that gun on the car? Did the gun or the car what about the jerk me behind both items it was me that did it... NOW its lets make new laws against the car owners, against the guns owners they are an easys target to pass lawys against...We as in SCOTUS and the Judicial Sytem can helppush through las easer that way , we won't violate anyones rights we'll just bend the Costitution to sutie our needs and they will have to accept it.. The hard part would be for any one of our knee jerk off politicians from PRES. to SCOTUS to say lets not violate the rights of the auto killer and the gunshooting killer by creating stiffer penanalties for them both take would take to much thought process and besdies we have to look out for our own elections to be PRES. to SCOTUS might not get back in office, make laws stiffer on penalties, no one wants that, ever notice it is get the guns off the street cars to big to get off road that is hard to create a law that say stiffer penalties stiffer penanalties for me I was the vitim I'm dead , who will help make stiffer penalties against what is done.My death is not worth a thing toward stiifer penlties all I see is more so caled preventive laws. What about my dead body don't I have a say? Won't someone speak up for me and make penaties harsher and as for the ibasity please it nedds a najor oeerhaul any time you hid stuff to kill someone it is not insane it is planned, and they know the more the body counts gets the better the NUT HATCH case defense will work.Please help those that died do not go after the living. Get the stiffer penalties and it cab have a bearing on the rest' This may be callous to some because they only take in a small area but look at it from a bigger picture, same principal dead is dead no matter pistol or car. You don't see any protetstors saying get rid af all equinox vehiclies get rid of the guns.well folks that was a gun I used, see it drawn on auto so now ban all equinox auto And until we as acountry ban to gether for stiffer penalties no amout of take off the street gun mentality will work.
If kids cant access guns, kids cant accidentally shoot themselves or others. Compare the deaths in America with firearms to the deaths in Australia with firearms, more guns more of a shootemup culture, more deaths in America. Of course there is Switzerland, which has high gun ownership, however, the males are all militia trained to protect their country. Close monitoring of ammunition and storage exists, thus no real problems. Still that is soon to be reduced. Wake up to the new world and...
…If kids cant access guns, kids cant accidentally shoot themselves or others. Compare the deaths in America with firearms to the deaths in Australia with firearms, more guns more of a shootemup culture, more deaths in America. Of course there is Switzerland, which has high gun ownership, however, the males are all militia trained to protect their country. Close monitoring of ammunition and storage exists, thus no real problems. Still that is soon to be reduced. Wake up to the new world and stop watching violent TV. We can sort things out without guns.
Alright, my women's lib is coming out 'males are all militia trained'! WHAT! I know a lot of women who are much better with a weapon than men. A gun is the equalizer. Size, weight, sex has nothing to do with ability. Even the Middle East trains their women and they fight. I'm sorry but that sounds very sexist and medieval to me. Sort things out! When people are evil and want to kill, they will. Dahmer killed without guns. HAd he lived in your country, how would you have explained him?
if people who buy the guns is not aloud to have the gun than that person and the seeler should both be punished convected fellons are not suppoesd to have guns yeat in calhoun county fellons are a loud too I've seen it with my own eyes so who's too blame when we pay law enforcement to take guns out of criminals hands and they turn there heads.
I don't think the fore fathers were talking about assault weapons when they wrote the 2nd amendment of the constitution. We don't carry guns in Canada and have a fraction of the crime rate that the united states have. I don't know if it's necessarily the guns but it makes me wonder.
Very well said.
Your a dumbass, the guns they had were the assault weapons of their time, and if you start taking away rights when will it stop. The Bill of Rights isn't for the government to dictate who can and can't do what, It guarantees these as every ones basic rights, not privileges. Privileges can be taken away, wake up or become a slave
F Mitt Romney!
I personally don't see the need to carry a firearm out into public, unless I'm living in a big city that's known to have a lot of crime. (I don't live in a big city, so that's one issue I don't have to face, thank goodness.)
However, the real truth is - violence and heavy-duty firearms *have* made their way in from other parts of the world into our borders/boundaries here. *These* are the weapons that we should also be very concern about - the high-powered assault rifles - the weapons of...
…I personally don't see the need to carry a firearm out into public, unless I'm living in a big city that's known to have a lot of crime. (I don't live in a big city, so that's one issue I don't have to face, thank goodness.)
However, the real truth is - violence and heavy-duty firearms *have* made their way in from other parts of the world into our borders/boundaries here. *These* are the weapons that we should also be very concern about - the high-powered assault rifles - the weapons of the Black Market.
What exactly does America/our leaders plan to do about these? You simply cannot just say "stop bringing them over here" and/or "stop carrying them" - because obviously, that's simply not going to happen. (As nice as this would be, and as much as many would like to see this happen.) These guns are going to keep making their way to our front doorstep, until we figure out a way to put an end to the reasons why these guns are made in the first place and why/how they make their way over here.
Gun retailers also need to be held highly accountable - as they are also an important link in all of this. If a gun retailer chooses to sell a gun to someone and does so *without* conducting the proper and *thorough* background check *FIRST* - then they should have their license/business stripped away, be put in jail, and/or endure a very hefty fine that they will never forget. (The permanent loss of their business license should be an automatic thing, though - as everyone needs to be on the *same page* on this issue and know that this is *not* a game! This could mean innocent lives could be lost, if a gun gets into the wrong hands.)
We need to be especially vigilant about gun shows - where some retailers complete a successful sale, without conducting any kind of background search at all! (I've seen this happen for myself - firsthand! I was in shock in disbelief when I saw it happen!) This is also another very real problem America faces today!
http://youtu.be/baPgr_tw79Q
Again, I think the same thing should happen to these people - permanent loss of their business license, hefty fine, and/or jail time.
I just had another after-thought!...I'm sorry, I'm just going to have to share this before I forget about it....
I think another thing that contributes to the current-day violence and obsession with guns - is because it's found *everywhere* in American media. You see them in movies, video games, comic books, on the internet/Youtube, music, etc etc - and these types of media can make guns look "cool" and "hip" to carry/use.
I think this is where our society need to be taught (re-taught?) that guns are: (1) *not* toys, (2) they're not to be taken out to settle disagreements [what happened to the good ol' handy-dandy fist?], (3) that they should be used as a *defense/protection* mechanism, and (4) that if you are ever found to mishandle/misuse a gun against another person/animal/thing, that you *will* be held reliable for your actions.
Once again, sorry for the secondary thought here - I just wanted to add this, as I know this is yet another factor in today's gun problem here in America.
The wat society is every LAW ABIDING citizen should possess at least one. Like jason hale said previously,"I've never seen a gun load itself". Focus more on the scrrening and you might control some distribution but one can't forget the black market. You can get whatever you want as long as you can afford it. There is no solution and really doesn't warrant a debate. Make mor things legal, tax the items, and problems clear themselves.